Peter and Harry try to figure out how to fight crime as a team.
What I Liked
I’m not a giant comics reader, but I’m enjoying the Ultimate series. Here the adult Peter Parker has figured out most of his roles and abilities, while working with Harry Osborne aka Green Goblin on the side of good. It was fun seeing them work with Doctor Octavius aka Doc Ock. Meanwhile, Kingpin has organized the Sinister Six to go after the dynamic duo, who go up against the first two. Meanwhile, Jonah, Ben, Gwen and MJ are getting The Paper going.
What I Didn’t Like
There’s a bunch of extended family stuff for Christmas that mostly goes nowhere fast.
After the Maker reshapes Earth so there are no superheroes, Stark’s son sends a message through dimensions to activate Spiderman with a radioactive spider.
What I Liked
I’m not a giant comics reader, but I always loved the Spiderman universe. I’ve seen the movies, watched a lot of the cartoons, grew up watching them in fact. So when I saw a list of books that some curators were doing of books they like to gift, and Ultimate Spiderman was on the list, I had to check it out. A few clicks later and I had the book file, plus an app to read it, and I was quickly immersed. I love the premise of Peter Parker becoming a superhero later in life, after he has already married MJ and had two kids. I even like the alternate timeline where Aunt May died, not Uncle Ben, and Uncle Ben works with J. Jonah Jameson at the Bugle. Seeing a different Peter Parker grow into the role is great.
What I Didn’t Like
Two things bothered me in the storyline. First and foremost, there is not near enough coverage of Peter learning to be Spiderman. Secondly, Osborne as a “good” Green Goblin is a little farfetched, particularly when you see him in business initially with Kingpin.
The choices made by three women intertwine from 1532 (Santo Domingo de la Calzada), 1827 (London), and 2019 (Boston).
What I Liked
The stories and world building are quite good, bringing 1532 and 1827 to life as the characters explore for the first time outside of their homes. The interchanges are lively, and I think I enjoyed 1827 the best. Rich, vibrant, and a sense of change.
What I Didn’t Like
The description of the plot leaves out a very crucial fact, one that isn’t revealed until about a fifth of the way into the book. Which is critical to choosing the book, critical to enjoying the book, and even critical to just understanding it. I thought the book was about witches and revenge on men, particularly the description of Boston in 2019, but it isn’t quite that genre at all. I really didn’t enjoy the descriptions of 1532, and without knowing where the story was going to go, I almost gave up on it. It was bleak and boring, with the main character of the era seemingly both proactive and smart at first and later just completely passive and rather dull. I won’t spoil the genre, there are clues in some of the descriptions, but I almost missed out on quite a good saga over the centuries.
I bought this book as a gift for my niece as she’s into fantasy and some horror, and I’m trying to decide if I “spoil” the genre before she gets to the reveal.
The Bottom Line
Good story, but buyers may be surprised by the genre
A former mob enforcer and cleaner has a new identity and no worries, until an unknown body turns up on her lawn.
What I Liked
The initial premise was kind of interesting — a former mob assassin / cleaner who has (mostly) retired finds a dead body on her lawn. A young female detective looks into the murder, and also thinks there is something off about the retired woman too. After that, it is all downhill.
What I Didn’t Like
I hated just about everything in this book. I was going to quit, but the author is an Agatha winner and an Edgar nominee. It can’t be THAT bad, can it? It has to get better? Nope. I was going to quit at the 30% mark.
At that point, we had Lorraine (the retired mobster) running around trying to investigate the crime. Everybody she meets, literally everybody, the first words out of her mouth are insults. Not just men…the family of the dead guy, witnesses she wants info from, the cops. It’s supposedly “wit” according to the promo copy, because she’s old and saying things that turn people off and surprise, they won’t help her. Really? How strange. Despite the fact that she’s supposed to be street wise, really good with planning murders and body disposals, skating by in life unseen and under the radar.
Oh, and every man she meets, they’re obviously sexist pigs who deserve to die. Oh, and did I mention she has a dead husband that seems like she misses him in the first half of the book and the second half she’s joking that he’s dead. Okaaaay. Did I also mention that she’s trying to figure out the case, but she abruptly kills the ONLY PERSON WHO KNOWS ANYTHING before finding anything out?
I had some hopes for the female detective. Some, not much. But the dead guy was a PI who was following a shady guy who was a drug dealer just before the PI ends up dead. It’s possible the drug dealer is into shady dealings with two other guys from high school. But other than Lorraine, the drug dealer is the ONLY real suspect. Yet at the 50% mark, Detective Mike has been investigating the case for several days and pauses to think, “What if the drug dealer killed him?”. Like, seriously? What the heck? He is the ONLY suspect at the time. There is virtually NOBODY else with any known motive. Yet she’s super smart and just figured out maybe he was involved? OMG.
I didn’t think this train wreck could get worse until Detective Mike accidentally finds some bad guys by random luck, there’s a farcical series of scenes moving a body, and Lorraine cracks part of the mystery with amazing deductive skills that make NO SENSE AT ALL. She makes a random guess that has nothing to do with any evidence, just “oh, it must be these two people”, one of whom WE HAVE NEVER MET. Oh, and a second mystery? It’s resolved by the person revealing themselves for fun and giggles.
Disclosure
I received a free copy of this book through Amazon First Reads. I am not friends with the author, nor have I interacted with them on social media.
I know, I know, I still have a backlog of over 300 more to do. But I remember when I was writing the first few almost 30 years ago (my first that I have a copy of, at least, was in 1998).
Over the years, I always plan to write one for every book I read, but I didn’t…hence the backlog. 🙂 I need to complete the backlog to update my other stats (read, reviewed, etc.).
I show 39 up until 1999;
From 2000-2007, I added only another 56, and then nothing for 2008-2010…or at least not that I have copies of, still;
From 2011-2019, I only have some for 6 of those years, with 25 more up until 2018 before I added a whopping 53 in 2019;
I added another 84 from 2020-2024; and,
Then only 27 last year.
I’m at 18 already written for this year, of which 6 or 7 are read this year. Shh, I am secretly trying to do 200ish for the year although my official target is much less.
I’m now posting them on my website, Amazon, Indigo, Book Notification and GoodReads, as well as sharing them on social media for X/Twitter, Threads, BlueSky and Meta/FB.
I don’t get a lot of feedback, but I’m hoping to build some interest in book club links over the next five years. Maybe it will, maybe it won’t. But I’m going to write and post them even if nobody but me reads them.
Cheers to me! When I retire, I’m going to try to post a new BR every day until I’m all caught up. I just have to get to retirement. 🙂
