↓
 

The PolyBlog

My view from the lilypads

  • Home
  • Goals
    • Goals (all posts)
    • #50by50 – Status of completion
    • PolyWogg’s Bucket List, updated for 2016
  • Life
    • Family (all posts)
    • Health and Spiritualism (all posts)
    • Learning and Ideas (all posts)
    • Computers (all posts)
    • Experiences (all posts)
    • Humour (all posts)
    • Quotes (all posts)
  • Photo Galleries
    • PandA Gallery
    • PolyWogg AstroPhotography
    • Flickr Account
  • Reviews
    • Books
      • Book Reviews (all posts)
      • Book reviews by…
        • Book Reviews List by Date of Review
        • Book Reviews List by Number
        • Book Reviews List by Title
        • Book Reviews List by Author
        • Book Reviews List by Rating
        • Book Reviews List by Year of Publication
        • Book Reviews List by Series
      • Special collections
        • The Sherlockian Universe
        • The Three Investigators
        • The World of Nancy Drew
      • PolyWogg’s Reading Challenge
        • 2026
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2015, 2016, 2017
    • Movies
      • Master Movie Reviews List (by Title)
      • Movie Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Movie Reviews (all posts)
    • Music and Podcasts
      • Master Music and Podcast Reviews (by Title)
      • Music Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Music Reviews (all posts)
      • Podcast Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Podcast Reviews (all posts)
    • Recipes
      • Master Recipe Reviews List (by Title)
      • Recipe Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Recipe Reviews (all posts)
    • Television
      • Master TV Season Reviews List (by Title)
      • TV Season Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Television Premieres (by Date of Post)
      • Television (all posts)
  • About Me
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Me
    • Privacy Policy
    • PolySites
      • ThePolyBlog.ca (Home)
      • PolyWogg.ca
      • AstroPontiac.ca
      • About ThePolyBlog.ca
    • WP colour choices
  • Andrea’s Corner

Tag Archives: blocks

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Thirty special blocks in WordPress

The PolyBlog
June 3 2020

Across the eight-block collections that I’m reviewing (default Gutenberg, JetPack, Advanced Gutenberg, Atomic Blocks, Kadence, Qodeblock, Stackable, and Ultimate Addons), there are a bunch of blocks that perform special functions. A couple show up in multiple collections; others in only one. Let’s run through them quickly.

Table of Contents

Ultimate has a fantastic block called “table of contents”. Just like in Word or other word processing programs, the page generates the ToC all by itself by recognizing where else in the page / post you have used headings. I frequently use H4, so I limit it to only grabbing those. I can style the background, width, texts, etc., even make the contents collapsible. Heck, I can even change the colour of the bullets…what’s not to love?

Advanced Gutenberg has a similar block called Summary but it takes all headings, with no real styling options. It works, but I have much more power with the Ultimate Addons one, so I’ll stick with it.

Notices, calls to action

Atomic Blocks has a block called Notice; Qodeblock has Inline Notice; and Stackable has Notification. The first two are virtually identical with a large block with a box around it, a bright colour for a heading, and some notice text to go under it. It is designed to stand out on a page, and frequently is used by companies right now for things like Covid notices or shipping delays or even specials. They can be “permanent” or you can make them so the viewer can dismiss them, almost like a popup.

Stackable, as always, has a different approach. They put the whole block in colour (not just the heading), and in addition to the title/heading and the description, they give you an option for a button.

They’re all okay, but honestly, I have a dozen different ways to do exactly the same thing. Pass. But interestingly, they all have a similar block called “call to action” blocks. What are they? Basically large text on a colour background, some description, and a button. Hmmm, sounds familiar.

Atomic Blocks lets me adjust fonts, colours, and the button. Qodeblock is the same. Ultimate goes in a slightly different direction by putting the button over to the side, and allowing it to stack on tablets and phones, but otherwise the same.

Stackable goes a bit crazy, as usual. They have six different layouts — two typical vertical ones, three different horizontal ones changing the relationship between the title and the description, and one called split centred which goes for a big title to the left and button and description stacked to the right. If you have the premium subscription, they have 33 different stylings all with unique backgrounds and colour schemes. Yep, they work. And while I confess I feel like I have almost no need for this type of block, I’m going to leave it active anyway. Just in case I want it in the future. Oh, and by the way? If you turn off the button, you basically have the same functional block as the notice ones. 🙂

Social blocks

I use the plugin AddToAny and it lets me include social icons at the end of each post. I also have a widget that lets me put it in my side bar. But some people want to put them in the middle of their page, which can be useful on a Contact Page for example, and so there are five separate blocks available in the collections to let you put in the social icons for people to click on. Some people use them for their own links, as well as giving people easy to click on “buttons” to get to a YouTube video or someone else’s Twitter feed. I have almost no use for any of these functions.

The Default collection includes Social Links and has options for not only icons but widgets too. The three choices ar medium-sized rounds, the logos only, or a flattened pill size button. Advanced Gutenberg has 16 presets in the Social Links block or you can upload any logo you want, as well as change the size and colour of the basic backgrounds. Atomic Blocks has a Sharing block, but limited to only six choices and none of the proper logos for each one (Twitter, Facebook, Pinterest, LinkedIn, Reddit, and Email), along with REALLY odd colouring. Qodeblock has Sharing Icons, and they too follow the AB model of not using the real logos, with the only difference being that the colour is better and they add Google. Last but not least, Ultimate adds one called Social Share, and it expands your choices to 12 sites — it adds Digg, Blogger, StumbleUpon, Tumblr and, wait for it, MySpace??? What is this, 1998? And just to be weird, they give you what looks like the real icon/logo, and only available in black and white? What the heck. NONE of the other blocks adds hardly anything to the default one as far as I can see, except perhaps styling the colours. I’ll leave the default, and disable the rest.

Tools for embedding

I’ve mentioned in other posts that there is a Default “embed” tool for a ton of different sites, almost none of which I use or would embed things from into my site. Sure, in theory, I could, but just as with the social sites, many of them are just of no interest or utility for me. So I disabled the blocks created for embedding from their sites too.

Three collections have a unique option for embedding a map. The Default collection uses a block called Embed: Map, and it links to a site called Mapbox.com. To embed from it, you need an Access Token, which you can get from creating a free account…which I did, and then it stopped working. I couldn’t figure out how to even tell it an address to show by default. Advanced Gutenberg wants a Google API key, and to be honest, I struggled to get a Google Map API for something else I was doing online. I’ve filled out the forms for three different types of APIs, and all of them fail at the OAuth stage, with no explanation as to why nor can I find any examples online that are any different from what I did. Ultimate has a block specifically for Google Map too, with the same results. It’s easier to just post a link that will open Google Maps itself, I guess, on the rare occasion I might actually need it.

As I mentioned, there is a LONG list of other embed options and I disabled most of them. A few that are more relevant to me are:

  • Twitter … It lets me insert an individual tweet by someone, all I need is the URL. Note that Twitter lets you do it too, by giving you an embed code for every tweet, but it has extra code with it and requires a custom HTML block to insert it. The default block works better.
  • Facebook … It seems like it would be the same as Twitter, you have to paste a URL. Except there’s a catch. You can only do it IF the entire timeline of the account is public. Not just THAT post even, the ENTIRE timeline. Kind of defeats the purpose, but when I think about it, it makes sense. Only people who are logged in can see various posts. Unlike Twitter where you can see anything whether you’re logged in or not. Dang, I was hoping to keep a few. Oh well, bye-bye FB block.
  • WordPress … So here’s another weird thing. The auto-WordPress embed works with my own URLs too. For this same site. Which means I have no use for any of the big fancy Posts blocks that show dozens of other posts at once.
  • Google Calendar … I thought there were actually two calendar blocks, just slightly different nomenclature but they are actually quite different. One of the default ones, called Calendar, is actually a calendar of all my posts that I’ve done i.e., for each day where I’ve posted something, it’s clickable to give the archives list of posts for that day. Definitely not something I would ever use. There is also an Embed: Google Calendar option, but after my experience with FB, I wasn’t surprised to find out that the Google Calendar you’re embedding has to be totally public. Not that helpful if you wanted to share a single event and make IT public somehow.

So I’m keeping the Twitter one, disabling the rest.

Formatted prose

In previous posts, I talked about all the different text blocks for various things. But I intentionally left out five that are pseudo-related, and all come from Default/Jetpack collections.

First and foremost, there is one called Verse. This is for the poets among us, or at least the ones who need control of spacing in their poetry. The block has a small mono font, and the block won’t adjust spacing no matter what. Indent three spaces? You’ll see three equal spaces. Type three dots? Same distance. So if you’re into writing poetry, and the visual wrapping points on the page are important, you can style them in the block. I don’t do poetry, but having a way to totally control spacing and blocks isn’t a bad tool to have from time to time. I’ll keep it.

A second block is called Code, and it meets a similar need for not messing with spacing and fonts. If you are into showing computer code, like CSS or HTML, the code block lets you paste it in, control relative monospacing, and have the webpage ignore it so it doesn’t think it is actual code that it should execute. But I don’t need two blocks doin the same thing, so I’ll keep verse and disable code (code tends to highlight its text a bit).

The third block is called Preformatted and does the exact same thing as the first two. So I can disable it too.

The fourth and fifth were mistakes I made in looking at them. I thought “custom HTML” was to allow you, like Code, to be able to type in HTML that people could see to learn HTML. Nope, it’s a block to actually let you manually enter HTML code and execute it in the page. Same with Markdown, but it actually executes Markdown language. I don’t need Markdown, but I’ll keep Custom HTML for some occasional uses, although I could always switch any block like a paragraph block to an HTML view and type it there. This is just easier and cleaner. It even has a preview built-in to the block.

Totally unique blocks

As I have gone through all the different posts in the last few days about different types of blocks, most of them I could group together. A bit arbitrarily at times, but often they had clones in other collections. The last five blocks are a bit more unique although the first one has a clone.

Both Advanced Gutenberg and Stackable have a block called “Count Up”. The intent for this block is often related to things like fund-raising or some sort of web-state or a stat in general that you want to show off. Let’s say, for example, you’re trying to raise $500,000 for a charity, and you want to show that you’re at $222,312 so far. If you put that number in a block, it’s kind of flat. Boring even. But the count-up block allows you to enter the number ($222K) and when it is on the screen, it will show the numbers count from 0 all the way to $222,312 really quickly. Advanced Gutenberg counts up slower than Stackable, but Stackable has a lot more styling options. But to be honest, I have absolutely no need for either, really. Cool, interesting even, but useful? Not for me.

Default+Jetpack adds a Star Rating block and I wish I had found it years ago, even if I’m not going to use it. Let me explain. I have book reviews, TV reviews, movie reviews, even recipes. Lots of things I *could* use a ratings block for, and probably should. But the image is that of a star. And while I can increase it up to a scale of 10, and even colour it dark green to fit in my overall theme, I can’t change the icon. And some time ago, I came across the frog emoji that fits in with my PolyWogg theme. So I use that. It’s manual, I’m not thrilled by it, but it works. And so I’ll stick with that, cuz I like me my frogs. 🙂

Ultimate includes one called Timeline, and I almost missed it because there is another “posts” block in one of the collections that lets you see all your posts in a timeline diagram. I have no use for it, so I was going to pass on this one as well. Except it isn’t about posts. Honestly, it’s kind of a weird inclusion in any collection, as it is more like a plugin option for those wanting graphs and things. You can create a vertical timeline with it, with “blocks” / “tabs” hanging off either side. You enter descriptions in blocks with a Heading and a description, and opposite it, you insert a date (actually, you put dates in the block options). And it will let you create, wait for it, up to 100 things in the timeline. Honestly, most people doing this on a website would use a graphic editor to create an infographic of some sort, and then just share it as a photo. But this one lets you create it like a Powerpoint tool in your website, and you can totally enter text and links in the description boxes. The default is alternating left and right (called centred), but you can have it all go left or right with stacking above each one. Equally, there is a default connector that looks like a calendar, but you can have any one of 1200 other icons for the “hub” of the timeline bar, and turn dates off if you want. As I said, it’s totally unique, nobody else has anything like it. I can’t think of ANY reason why I would want it, but I have to keep it. It’s just too cool not to keep it.

And finally, the last block is from the Default+Jetpack collection and is a simple Contact Info block. While lots of other blocks had ways to show off contacts for team members, or bios, this is more of a website tool.

You can enter an email, phone number, street address, City, Province, Postal Code, Country, and link to a Google Map. I initially was of the mind, I have ZERO use for this. It was more for businesses, for example. Except, any of the rows that you don’t enter, it just ignores them and collapses the info. So if I wanted to give an address to, I don’t know, the place I was doing some astronomy, I could put in the info, and it would show up as an address that was clickable to a link. Now that I see it, I can see some of the allure. But if it is just a link, I have way better ways to do that. I could even make it a button, for example, that jumps to a Google Map. I can see the appeal, but not interested.

Update – Another special block

Shortly after I was nearing the end of my review of these blocks, Ultimate Addons included two “new” blocks that are “schema” friendly, but I don’t need that functionality per se. One is a “how-to” format for a page, but it’s pretty rough, and I have no real use for it. I can create my own headings just as easily. However, they have a second one to create a FAQ page, and it is pretty decent. Another “unique” one, although you could do the same with collapsible accordions just as easily. This just formats easily. I’ll keep it around.

Update: To see my current collection of blocks, check out the blocks I use.

Posted in Computers | Tagged blocks, computers | Leave a reply

The structural blocks I use in WordPress to organize a page or post

The PolyBlog
June 2 2020

All of the block collections ((default ones, JetPack, Advanced Gutenberg, Atomic Blocks, Kadence, Qodeblock, Stackable, and Ultimate Addons) come with multiple block options that let you better organize text on the page. There are lists, tables, columns, forms, tabs, accordions, and speciality tools. Let’s get started, as this is a big area.

Lists

For lists, the default block is called simply List. Not much you can do with it — it’s either bullets or numbers, and if it is numbers, all you can do is change the starting value. If it is bullets, you can’t even change the look or feel.

Advanced Gutenberg has its Advanced List. At first, I thought it was going to give me more control over numbered lists, but alas, no. It is about icons — 14 very basic ones, in fact. I can change the colour and sizes, but that’s about it. AG also has one called Advanced Icon, but all it does is let you put in a very large icon as a sort of clip art. The list of choices is huge, but it’s exact use eludes me unless you wrap it next to other text or image blocks. Pass.

Kadence also has an icon-based list, called Icon List. It is quite well done in my view. You can choose the number of items in the list, as per normal, but you can easily reorder them using arrows or delete individual entries afterwards too. More importantly, you can decide how many COLUMNS you want them in. That’s pretty sweet. Of course, you can also adjust the colours and sizing, padding and margins, but when it comes to the icon itself, you have about 1600 choices. That sounds really impressive, but most of them you would never have a use for, so the real value is if they have one that you DO want. If I wanted a computer one, there is none per se, but searching for monitor pulls up two (light outline, dark outline). There are also save icons, CD icons, tablets, and smartphones. You can likely find SOMETHING that will work. Checkmark pulls up about 10 different choices that are viable for me. Nothing exciting, but workable. And I really like the two columns. Kadence also has an option for a single big icon, but I honestly don’t know what the advantage of it would be over coloured clipart in your media library.

Ultimate Addons has a neat option in their Icon List block — you can insert an IMAGE as your icon. It makes it incredibly SMALL, sure, but you can do it. You can also turn list items into links. But their icons are rather rudimentary with about 1200, and things like computers or monitors turn up nothing…many of the icons seem to be company logos (like Amazon or Twitter). Pass.

That leaves me with Stackable as the last one (Icon List). Once again, starting a list in Stackable is like all the others combined. It starts with two columns as its default, a six-item list with nice checkmarks for each icon. In the design options, you quickly see the power of the block — you can have a title row, descriptions, and then the list in multiple columns. I paid for Stackable’s premium collection and there are some absolutely stunning layouts. I have no idea when I would ever want such a list, but it’s nice to know I have that power. But back to the basics.

You can have up to four columns of items, and turn on / off whether you want them evenly spaced or item-dependent for the size of the columns. The icons are it’s limitation — it only has five to choose from (checkmark, plus sign, greater than symbol angling right, an X, and a star. You can have three different flavours of each — by itself, inside a hollow circle, or inside a filled circle. All three are “nice”, but hardly the power of 1200 or 1600 icons, even if you wouldn’t use most of them. The colour is selectable of course, and size can go up to 50 px. You have Stackable’s standard power for its text and typography, spacing between items, background for the block, and all of the options for the advanced spacing / alignment / padding.

But overall? While it gives a lot of power, I’m disappointed there’s no option to add other icons nor is there a possibility of inserting an image as an icon. There are blocks that do that on a larger scale, sure, like the pricing box, but I was expecting more.

And what disappoints me most is that none of the blocks handle the simple option of ordered lists. Would it be so hard to give me one that does letters or numbers in stylized fonts? Or that adds Roman numerals?

For now, I have to keep three blocks — default to handle numbered lists; Kadence to give me 1600 icons; and Stackable for the great formatting options. Sigh.

Tables

I generally like tables because it makes things easier for layout of data and information. Unfortunately, it is not very mobile-friendly. For larger data sets, I have no choice, I use Table Press. It’s the only way to use the information easily. If only I had a really good table block that would make those overhead choices less required (but wouldn’t be searchable, I know). There are basically only two blocks available.

First and foremost is the default Table block, and it has the obvious starting point of asking how many columns and rows. But something weird happens when I click on a table, and I’m not sure where the conflict lies.

Let’s imagine I create a simple two by two table. If I click on cell one, column one, it goes wonky for the first row. It “appears” that there are three cells in the first row because it shifts my first cell into the second column, and the second into the third. Almost like it is giving me a “pop-out” cell to allow me to edit. Similarly, for column 2, when I click on the cell it shows me the second cell out in column 3. Maybe it is designed to do that, maybe it’s a conflict, doesn’t really matter, it’s just annoying. The choices for the table are pretty basic — I can have fixed width ones, add a header section or footer section, and change colours or add/delete rows and columns. Not that I need to be able to do much ELSE with a table, but it’s pretty basic. Oh, I forgot, I can add alternating strips and a caption too. It does NOT, however, seem to let me change the colour of an individual cell as I used to be able to do in Classic Editor.

Advanced Gutenberg is the only collection that includes a table alternative, and it too starts with asking me how many columns or rows. Again, I have choices of striped rows; fixed-width cells; footers; and headers. But I can also have collapsed borders, change the overall width of the table in px, change the colours for an individual cell (text and background), borders on every cell, width of the table, paddings, and margins.

Everything the default can do and way more. There’s really no reason to keep the default Table block if I have the Advanced Table block installed, right? Wrong. Because while I can find any example of a Table block if it is in normal blocks, if there are any still wrapped inside a Classic Paragraph block, those are more like “inline” tables, and my searching doesn’t pick all of them up! Dang it. Plus, just for fun? If WP encounters a block with a table, and I convert all of it to blocks, the default block is, well, the default Table block that it has to convert to. Which makes me realize the same for quotes. I disabled Quote and PullQuote but I can’t, I need those there for WP’s internal defaults to find. Double dang.

Columns

One of the things that Gutenberg allowed was an easy way to do columns on the fly, and without resorting to tables to do it. The default block has five main options:

  • Two columns equal;
  • Two columns with left as more of a sidebar;
  • Two columns with right as a sidebar;
  • Three equal columns; and,
  • Three columns, centre is large and the left and right are like sidebars.

If you skip this step, the block defaults to two equal columns and you can modify the number of columns up to six equal ones. Some people do a series of columns to give an almost page-builder field…so three columns, one column, two columns can give you almost a star look to your layout.

But other than that, there isn’t a lot you can do to the columns themselves other than change percentages. However, you can put almost any other block INSIDE them. So, for example, if you had a block that didn’t come with sizing options, you can stick it inside a column, and BAM!, you can control the width. You can also control vertical alignment within a block or change the background of the whole block.

Kadence’s block is oddly called Row Layout, which I guess in many ways it is — a single row of a table with multiple columns. And the initial layout options make the default one look like a Word table compared to an Excel spreadsheet. Kadence has:

  • Single column (why????)
  • Two columns (equal or sidebars left and right)
  • Three columns (equal, sidebars left and right, narrower sidebars left and right, really narrow sidebars left and right, two side bars left, and two sidebars right)
  • Four columns (equal, 3 sidebars left or 3 right)
  • Five equal columns
  • Six equal columns

But if you click on the box, they even add another layout option to the settings on the right — rows stacked above each other! Plus they have a Prebuilt Library with some options like three columns, with staff info boxes in them, or three columns with images in each. Perfect “alignment” already done, and the ability to colour backgrounds, etc. You can play with alignments, colours, percentage widths by dragging boxes, adding background colours/video/sliders to the block, etc. It’s a pretty decent option.

Advanced Gutenberg calls their block Columns Manager, and they start with the same options as Kadence with some extra narrow sidebar options with only two blocks. You can add space between columns, or do some sort of column wrap if you go over a maximum height (appears to be like wrapping in columns in Word). I couldn’t get it to work. I also set a maximum “height” on the block, and while it “sort of” held to it, what that meant was it held the main block to that and let the next block come right up to that limit, but since my block went past that, it just overlapped the text. Umm…I guess that could be useful. Maybe? I dunno. It’s not really doing anything for me.

Atomic Blocks has a columns option called Advanced Columns. You know, the same as three other plugins, cuz that won’t be confusing. It starts off much simpler — you choose the number of columns you want, from 1 to 6. Then once you do that, you get to see the sub-options. Once created, you can adjust number of columns, switch layouts, size of gaps between columns, size of the overall three columns together (an internal width so they don’t have to go all the way from side margin to side margin), make them responsive, adjust margins, padding, colours and even stick a background image on the whole block. Like Kadence, highly functional.

As an aside, as this isn’t entirely the place to do it, AB also includes an option called Layouts. While it handles way more than columns, several of the layouts are with columns, nice backgrounds, pleasing palettes, etc. But when I see these, I feel like most of them are more about pseudo-theme building, and I already have a theme I like. Pass.

Moving on to QodeBlock, it’s the “Advanced Columns” block again. It has decent tools, similar to the rest, but here’s the thing…it handles the editing through stacked blocks. So you don’t “see” it vertically the way the other blocks do, it shows you them in the edit window one above the other. WTH? Pass. (Okay, I just realized they are likely doing that to show you what it will look like on mobile where it would likely stack. Hmm, I guess it’s okay, but I’m still passing.)

Ultimate uses the same naming convention, Advanced Columns, and it has some nice features. For example, it outlines the whole block and the columns in the edit window with dotted lines so you can SEE your boxes. (Are you listening, Qodeblock?) It even has options to reverse the columns on certain devices. You can also change the container (inner) width, colours, borders, shadows, dividers, etc. All decent, functional. And very little “wow” factor. Pass.

As you’ll have seen from previous posts, I’m kind of in love with Stackable. So for each category, I tend to save them to the last option hoping they will blow me away. Right from the start, they don’t disappoint. I am mostly testing the options with three columns, and theirs starts off looking pretty bland. Once you click into the block options, you can adjust from 1-6 blocks (standard), choose some layouts (standard), and then, adjust any column to any percent you want (NOT standard). Do you want a 20-70-10 split? Done. Do you want a 15-70-15 split? Done. Do you want a 40-40-20 split? Also done. Done, done and done. Sweet.

Then they go nuts on layout options. Honestly, I have never even thought of these options, at least not for a website! They have five options — plain (obvious), grid (three columns, two rows = up to six blocks), uneven 1 (the first column is full height, the rest are evenly stacked in columns two and three), uneven 2 (the first column is full height, and some of the rows span columns 2 and 3), and Tiled (the first column is full height and then the other two columns are mixed-width with some spanning two columns, one only one). The options depend on whether you choose one to six “columns” (or rather one to six sub-blocks). If you’ve ever made a photo book online where it asked you if you wanted layout options with 3 or 4 photos, and then showed you various layout options that would fit them all in, this is the look and feel they have for the Stackable block. Lightyears beyond the controls of the other options, which is likely why they called it “Advanced Columns AND GRID“. Once you click into the Style tab, things take the volume dial to 11 instantly. You get more ways to control the widths of the sub-blocks, adjust their heights, change spacings within and between, align them vertically and horizontally, change text colours, add a header/title and description, and of course, as with all Stackable blocks, add background options (image, video, colour, gradients, whatever you want). Holy snicker-doodles. Yeah, I can keep this one and dump the rest. By a country mile.

Before exiting this area, I’ll throw in another Stackable block called Number Box. It isn’t quite a normal box like some of the other testimonial ones, it almost acts like a column or table, so I’m including it here. It allows you to choose a series of side-by-side blocks, and it adds numbers to the top. Think of it like a numbered list but horizontal with a lot more styling. Nobody else has anything quite like it. You’re limited to just 1, 2, 3 and if you want, you can even turn the numbers off (I don’t know why you would use a number box and turn the numbers off, but whatever tickles your fancy. While it seems like a simple variation on the team boxes, and to some extent it is, the styling options that come with it raise it WAY above that simple config. One gives you three bright orange circles; another puts funky mosaic tile shapes around an image of phone; another swaps out numbers and puts in letters (although to be fair, it’s just manually edited). You can change the number text, and if you wanted to, stack them to give a series of steps. Which is why I’m going to keep it around. I have lots of places in my site where I need to show steps in a sequence. But wait, there’s more! You can add a title for the block AND a description too. A fully contained block that lets you create sweet 1-3 column layouts with everything already styled for you with awesome choices, or swap out the backgrounds and colours with your own choices (it has all the Stackable default options for styling and layout). It’s awesome.

Forms

It might seem a little odd to include this option in the list, but it is essentially a tool for defining rows and columns in a set grid to create content structure.

Kadence has its Form button, and it’s pretty basic. By default, it gives you an option for a contact form — name, email, and a message, with a submit button. Regardless of the defaults, it basically is a data capture tool with text fields, email, textareas, telephone and accept or select options. You can change defaults, alter widths, add help boxes, etc. There are settings for the name, email, messages, what happens after you press submit, technical email options, spam and Recaptcha options, field styles, button styles, label styles, and success messages. All pretty basic but decent tools. And most seem irrelevant if you have something like Contact Form 7 installed.

Advanced Gutenberg has one called Contact Form and it does the same thing. It has a few less styling options, but same basic functionality. They also include one for login / registration. Since I don’t allow registration, the purpose would be solely to add a bit more look and feel styling to my normal login screen. Useful for some, nothing to offer me.

Ultimate goes one step further…they offer a styler that works directly with Contact Form 7. This is a GREAT tool, and since I use Contact Form 7, no reason for me to keep the other ones. This lets me adjust my CF7 form for a number of look and feel / style options as well as adding things like radio buttons. If you do enough data fields, you could turn it into almost a survey tool. Nice. I’ll keep it.

Tabs

Under the Classic Editor, I only ever used tabs once on a report page where I had different sections and it seemed the best way to do it. Under the Block Editor, I recently used it for a page for my HR Guide, but just once. It isn’t a tool that I reach for regularly in my toolbox, but when I need it, I need a tool that will do it.

Kadence is the one I used for my HR guide, and the opening to the Tabs block is the reason why — you have different styles of tabs to choose from, one of which is vertical tabs going down the side (which is what I used for my HR Guide). They also come with responsive choices for tablet and phone so that the tabs switch to vertical on smaller devices and potentially even to stacked accordions if it is on a phone. However, unlike the Columns options that limited you to up to six, tabs are relatively unlimited. Equally, each tab can have a totally different content block…images, text, whatever you want. You could, in theory, create a photo gallery using tabs. You can even choose which tab “opens” first when you open the page. And since it is Kadence, they include 1600 icons as possible additions to your tabs and text, even after you style the tabs out the wazoo for colour and text and borders, oh my! There are another 5-8 options I’ll never use, but they’re there.

Advanced Gutenberg has its Advanced Tabs option, and I like the initial look. The tabs are crisp and bright. You can make them vertical or horizontal, adjust colours and text. But way fewer options than the

Accordions

The sister block to “tabs” is an accordion block. Rather than having you “page” between sub-tabs, accordions expand when you click on them. There is no default one, but just about everyone else does one:

  • Kadence has an “accordion” block with some basic styling and layout options, and gives you a chance to add a title to the overall block, plus lots of basic options for reach “pane”…the only part that stood out as different from standard styling was the option to have panes only open one at a time i.e., if one opened, the others would close, rather than allowing them all open until manually closed;
  • Advanced Gutenberg uses their normal nomenclature to have Advanced Accordion, with set icons to identify expansion, standard colours and text styling options, etc…nothing “advanced”, pass;
  • Atomic Blocks calls its block simply “Accordion”, and it is indeed simple. A single block that expands and collapses, with almost no styling. Yawn;
  • QodeBlocks does almost the same as AB, although it has nicer colours on the Title. Double yawn;

Which leaves me completely underwhelmed. Will Stackable wake me up? Not really. They too only go with a single one, although they have some options to do things based on what the adjacent one does (like close if the other opens). But overall, they’re pretty tame by Stackable standards. They have lots of basic stylings, but even the premium options are non-existent. I’ll keep it around for some features, but I’ll have to keep the Kadence one too.

More / read more / page break

The default “more” block allows you to basically separate an opening excerpt from the rest of the text, so if you are looking at the page on the main blog page for example, you’ll see up to the More take, and not past. Click it and it will expand the page. Except I don’t use custom excerpts and have no use for it.

Stackable has an option that is a lot like accordions. There is some short text, and when you click on the “show more”, it expands the text. Except it doesn’t “expand” so much as completely replace that first text with all new text. So if you had a short sentence, and click on it, you can replace the short version with the full explanation. Some people like to use it for short and long instructions — if you know how to do what it tells you, just go with the short; if you need detailed sub-instructions, click for the longer version of the instruction. Often the first sentence is repeated in the longer text so it LOOKS like an expansion, but it really is two totally different text fields. It’s useful, so I’ll keep it around.

Default also includes a “page break” block. If you think of it a different way, it is kind of like adding tabs to the bottom of a page. Wherever you put a page break block, the visible page will break there, and you will get a view of the subsequent pages to click on. There are some styling issues as to where that block appears (for example, on my default page here, it put them after a bunch of after-post stylings instead of before them. There are no styling options, and I can’t think of where I would use it except perhaps in some sort of long fiction post. Otherwise, I’m more likely to break it into multiple posts, use tabs, or even accordions. I’ll leave it running but I doubt I’ll use it.

And that’s a wrap on structural blocks for styling my pages and posts.

Update: To see my current collection of blocks, check out the blocks I use.

Posted in Computers | Tagged blocks, website, WordPress | Leave a reply

The button block I use in WordPress

The PolyBlog
May 31 2020

All of the main block collections come with a “button” block (default blocks, Advanced Gutenberg, Atomic Blocks, Kadence, Qodeblock, Stackable, and Ultimate Addons). The purpose is simple — add some text, add a URL, add some styling, and when the user clicks on it, it goes to the link.

The default Buttons block is relatively simple, as most of them are…you can choose whether it opens in the same window or a new window, the size of the button (small, medium, large or extra-large), the button shape (square, rounded square or circular — more like ovals), button colour, and text colour, and of course the URL. Easier than using shortcodes as I used to have to do before Gutenberg. They work, they’re functional, but the real challenge is they only really work if you want one. Which is ironic since they name the block in the plural, but do not have any options to put several side-by-side, unless you wrap them in some sort of table or other type grid block.

Kadence calls their block Advanced Button and it solves the challenge of having multiple buttons side by side right off the bat. You can set the number of buttons and then align the group to the left, right or centred. After that, each button has its own options — text size, button size (with paddings), button width, hover options, backgrounds, borders, colours, and spacing before the next button. You can even add an icon inside the button. It has almost everything you would want, and definitely more than the default.

Advanced Gutenberg also calls their button block the Advanced Button and seems to have a few more initial styles (default, outlined, squared, squared outline) but when you look at them more closely, you see that it is really a round one or squared one, with either the button filled or just an outline. Text and fill colours are standard options, but I like the 8 different types of borders it offers. Except I have no real need for dotted button borders. Not sure I ever would.

Atomic Blocks and Qodeblock both just call their block Button and they are almost as basic as the default one.

Ultimate has two button blocks, one called Multi Buttons and one called Marketing Button. Multi sets you up with two initially and a click of a button will add more across the page. Each one starts off pretty basic, and you can tweak colours for the text, background, border, and hover. And, as mentioned above, you can change border weight and type (solid, dashed, etc.) for each button. By contrast, the Marketing Button is a little more robust. It is designed to be a single button on the row, but you have the ability to add a button icon to help style your “call to action”, change the typography of the text which has two lines — one title, one description — as well as all the colour attributes. Pretty decent, and the only option that allows you “officially” two lines of text…however, most of the others allow a second row if you just hit a hard enter in the main text.

Stackable by contrast does its usual job of blowing the doors off the competition. It starts with them just calling it “button” (singular), but there are five separate layouts as soon as you create one. The layout shows three and it gives you the option of three basic buttons side-by-side, three spread farther apart across the page, one going the full width of the page, and then, just for fun, options to group the set of three so there are two to the right and one to the left or one to the right and two to the left. Way beyond anything the others were offering. Of course, Stackable also gives you some specific designs to get you started…One option they include is a button that doesn’t look like a button, whereby they have two that are styled as different colours, standard looking buttons, and then the third one just says “Learn More” and looks like a link. However, it is a third button — with transparent background, no border, and no fill. Until you hover over it. My only lament is that you are limited to three buttons. And since it is Stackable, you can massage the heck out of all the settings for typography, backgrounds for the block, spacing, separators, etc. Yeah, yeah, same old, same old awesome. Of course, I’m keeping this one.

But I’m also going to keep “multi-buttons” in case I need a simple option that goes above 3.

Update: To see my current collection of blocks, check out the blocks I use.

Posted in Computers | Tagged blocks, WordPress | Leave a reply

I don’t want a group/container block in WordPress

The PolyBlog
May 18 2020

The default blocks in Gutenberg blocks includes a “group” block. Atomic Blocks, Qodeblock and Stackable added their own called “container”. The point of these “parent” blocks is to add a container around a bunch of nested blocks within it. Suppose, for example, you have four blocks that always go together — a header, a paragraph of text, an image, and some links. You could put those four inside a block, and then if you want to move them around a page, you just move the big container block, and all of those sub-blocks / child blocks will move at once. They stay together. Alternatively, where it becomes really useful is if you put the four child blocks in a reusable group block, say for example instructions on how to do something that you frequently refer to in your posts, and you can dump that block in anytime you need it.

While that can also start to make a site look repetitive in a blogging world, one area where it could be useful in my site is the close-out of a book review. At the end of my book reviews, I use to have three things — a set disclaimer about my review (now removed as irrelevant), links to other reviews, and a signature block saying Happy Reading. If I wrapped all three of those together in a reusable group block, I could just paste all three at the end of every BR and be “done”.

To me, though, the real danger is that repetition. You start to think every page is the same, and you just dump something in without thinking about whether all three pieces are appropriate. Take the disclaimer for example. While I could add it to every BR, it was only relevant to a couple. And the more I played with wording and tweaking, the more I realized it was just unnecessary. In a commercial world, people frequently stick in boilerplate info because they “can” without thinking about whether they “should”.

I’m happy to do reusable blocks for various signatures like “Happy reading” or “Clear skies”, as it saves some steps, but grouping too many things together makes me nervous. It honestly encourages lazy design rather than conscious design. I know, I know, I’m likely over-thinking it.

The default Group block has very few settings to tweak, mainly the idea that you group them together but the only thing you can change is a background colour. Nothing terribly exciting.

Atomic Blocks’ Container block adds the ability to do padding and margins, and this COULD be useful, set an overall width on the container (so if some child blocks like to go full-width, you could over-ride their tendencies here by wrapping them in a larger but thinner container). In addition, you can replace the background with an image, not just change the colour. Definitely better than the default. Qodeblocks’ container is identical. You’d swear they were just copies of each other.

From my earlier posts, you already know that I’m in love with Stackable’s approach to just about all of their blocks. So I was excited to see what options they add. Height and width are nice additions, gradients are added to background colours, you can use video instead of an image, separator styling above and below, etc. There are some premium features that allow custom column colours and things like that, but considering I don’t have much need for such a block, and I’m fearful of over-use, I’ll stick with the base options. And I wasn’t disappointed. Stackable adds all of the options that the other three options did, plus some more. Definitely a keeper.

I know, I know, you’re thinking, if you’re not going to use it, why are you keeping it? I’m keeping it simply because I like the option if I need it without having to re-install it. I’ll still be hesitant, but I do like the option of wrapping a background colour behind it. For example, I could excerpt some stuff from other websites or even include segments in posts where I want to highlight several blocks at once. This would be one way to do that.

Update: To see my current collection of blocks, check out the blocks I use.

Posted in Computers | Tagged blocks, computers, experience, WordPress | Leave a reply

The blocks I use in WordPress

The PolyBlog
May 18 2020

I have been reviewing blocks from different block collections and plugins (default blocks, JetPack, Advanced Gutenberg, Atomic Blocks, Kadence, Qodeblock, Stackable, and Ultimate Addons) and choosing the ones I like while deactivating the rest. It’s weird doing the reviews as normally you would say “Here’s block X and Y” and compare the visual features in the post as well as some of the back-end options.

Except that once I deactivate block X because I liked block Y better, block X disappears from the display. In WordPress, there is something called graceful degradation for plugins which is the idea that if I use a plugin to insert an image, for example, with custom styling and then later remove the plugin, the page should still load perfectly fine.

But blocks do NOT degrade gracefully; it is an on/off switch. Once I finish the review post and deactivate the ones I don’t like, the post won’t display properly except for the blocks I kept activated. However, I did want a post where I showed off the blocks I am keeping/using. But I’m not done my full review yet so this page will get updated as I work my way through them.



Update May 13 – Text blocks

The most basic of the three text blocks is the paragraph block and here it is! Although I added a blue background and Drop Cap to make it stand out.

A classic block doesn’t have the same background controls, but it gives me back all the styling options and plugins that the old classic editor had. So, for example, I use a NextGen Gallery image chooser that works in classic but doesn’t have a block option yet. If I use it in classic mode, I can insert an image from my NGG gallery, as I used to, and move on. Some people like it for inserting tables too. But, on the front end, there is nothing to look at that says “Hey that was done with a classic block rather than a paragraph block”.

So what’s the third text block? The heading block. Which I used above to designate “update May 13” at H2 level and coloured green.


Update May 16 – Media blocks

Stackable adds an option to include images as a Header style like what you do at the top of a webpage. If I wanted to, I could create a page and use my theme controls to remove my existing theme elements from just that page, and use this block to simulate a whole other look and feel. Almost like creating a theme for a single page. However, most people are likely to use it create large intros to pages. Since it is with Stackable, there are a lot of options to tweak the look and feel.

I can add text over the image

And some description. If I want, I can even create a Call to Action with the button below.

Button text

Now that I’ve shown individual images, let’s look at galleries. Since I use NextGen for my website, I use their block for my galleries. There aren’t any control options for the block, everything is done within the NextGen settings when you choose your gallery and specific layout options. I like the Pro Thumbnail layout with captions for my default gallery of choice, as it allows you to switch to LightBox when you click on it. One downside to the NGG galleries is that they aren’t WYSIWYG — you only see them when you click preview since they pull data from saved databases (i.e., they have to generate the gallery).

The next media block is the “media and text” block and what I really like it for is videos. It really acts almost like a container block — a media / image / video block to insert the file and then two-paragraph blocks for description. I added a green background to make it stand out. The media can go on the left or right, and I can adjust the vertical alignment of the text. Mostly I like it because while NextGen handles images, it doesn’t handle video. So when I do a gallery page, and I want to add video, I have to do that manually underneath and they look a little boring. But lots of people just use it for putting text next to individual images.

Fireworks from 2005

I can even add some text for the description.

For videos, there is a separate video block, and it does the basics just fine. I can add a caption at the bottom, but most of the settings come from the either initial select options in the media library (such as adjusting size) or are limited in the block controls to player controls (auto-play, mute, etc). Unfortunately, the size options won’t let you go “bigger” than the original.

I can add a caption at the bottom.

However, the real power in WordPress is a totally separate block simply called “embed”. None of my default options would let me add a TED talk. YouTube and Vimeo options are easy, but embedding a TED talk? There is something in their wrappers that various blocks just get confused by and throw in the towel. So instead of using such a block, I go to TED Talks, find a sample one, click on the SHARE button to get a link, and just paste it into a new empty block. WordPress automatically reads that I’ve inserted a link, launches the EMBED block, and bam, there’s your TED Talk. I don’t have any controls for that block but it’s there.


Update May 17 – Page dividers

I have three page dividers, courtesy of the Stackable collection, and you’ve already seen one of them. The red bar just above this update to separate it from the previous update? It’s a “divider block”. There are other tweaks I could make to it but that’s a basic thick bar almost full-width.

The next one is a spacer block. I could leave it white, but then you wouldn’t be able to see it. Instead, I threw in a gradient option from red to blue.

After that comes the basic separator block. I’ll style it so it is a “bottom wave” to go with this paragraph. The blue is the actual separator, but I added grey background past that so you could see the size of the full block. It’s wider than I would normally want, but I could always throw it into a container block to literally contain / limit it.


Update May 17 – File or Audio blocks

I mentioned in my update that I don’t need a file block as I use a plugin to manage my downloads. Here is what a link looks like to embed a download of my HR guide. [ddownload id=”9141″]

Equally, I don’t use the audio blocks either, as most of my playlists are going to come from Apple Music/iTunes. Instead, I paste the embed code directly from Apple Music and let WordPress figure out the display. I can use Apple Music’s widget tweaker to adjust what the block looks like, but for illustration, here is the default paste below.


Update May 17 – Feature blocks, product blocks, pricing blocks, etc.

This is Stackable’s blockquote plugin and I love the power of it. This is the most basic of settings, but you can tweak everything out the wazoo.

I already demonstrated their Header block above (the second photo of water with bull rushes).

For their Team Member block, I don’t have a lot of need for it.

I also am keeping their Feature block and Pricing block around for future projects.

Computer

Computer

$1.00

each

Button text

The pricing block has lots of options, most of which I will never use. But I do have some ideas on how to use it for giving people “choices” side by side.


Update May 18 – Group containers

I said in my post that I don’t want a group / container block. I think it encourages reusable blocks that should be more finely tuned or just general laziness in design. But here’s a reason to keep it around — limiting the width of a container that doesn’t have such an option. Like farther back in this post, I pasted / embedded a TED talk. But when I did that, I have ZERO options to control the video without dropping to code. Although even when I dropped to code to see it in HTML, the options to set the size were not there by default, I’d have to add them. Instead, I can embed it in a container below, put a gradient background of blue to grey so you can see the container and limit the content to 50% of the width. It automatically adjusts the blocks within it i.e., the video screen that didn’t have a width option before does now. Now, is this the best example? Nope. The container didn’t adjust the video for height, so it looks odd. But I can at least change it. I’m more likely to use it for things like price blocks or interesting “design” blocks that didn’t come with a width setting rather than trying to force an external video in. Besides, I have other ways to do that, so this was more just an example of what could be done when the default option wasn’t there.

Posted in Computers | Tagged blocks, computers, WordPress | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Countdown to Retirement

Days

Hours

Minutes

Seconds

Retirement!

One of my favourite sites

And it's new sister site

My Latest Posts

  • AI testing: The Bad…Time loops, tech support quirks, and driftApril 18, 2026
    By now, most people have seen some form of AI crop up in their tools. The most obvious one is Google’s search engine, which provides results from its AI mode first in the list. You can go pretty far with that prompt, even asking for image creation, although that’s a terrible place to create images … Continue reading →
  • More workplanning on my new Calibre libraryMarch 28, 2026
    I wrote earlier this week (Using Calibre to embrace my inner librarian for ebooks) about the Poly Library 3.0, and when I did, I thought I had most of my “work” done. I had decided on three main areas (the book profile, user engagement, and user tools), although, truth be told, I had four categories … Continue reading →
  • An update on Jacob…March 24, 2026
    For those of you who don’t know, as I didn’t blog about this much before, Jacob decided to have surgery on his legs this year, which he did at the end of February. I’ve held off posting anything as I didn’t want to ask Jacob what he was comfortable with me sharing, but today was … Continue reading →
  • Using Calibre to embrace my inner librarian for ebooksMarch 23, 2026
    I have used Calibre literally for years to manage all my ebooks. It started way back when Kindle was doing a huge business of people pushing freebies of their ebooks. Some good, some slush, all free. But it meant a LOT of ebooks to manage. So I tried a couple of programs, most of which … Continue reading →
  • What would you put in a personal health dashboard / framework?March 8, 2026
    I started this year with a few short plans to work on health factors in my life. Some of it was prescribed; I needed a physical exam for certain pension forms. Others were ones that I was trying to do some proactive work on, like my teeth and my feet. And still others were more … Continue reading →

Archives

Categories

© 1996-2025 - PolyWogg Privacy Policy
↑