↓
 

The PolyBlog

My view from the lilypads

  • Home
  • Goals
    • Goals (all posts)
    • #50by50 – Status of completion
    • PolyWogg’s Bucket List, updated for 2016
  • Life
    • Family (all posts)
    • Health and Spiritualism (all posts)
    • Learning and Ideas (all posts)
    • Computers (all posts)
    • Experiences (all posts)
    • Humour (all posts)
    • Quotes (all posts)
  • Photo Galleries
    • PandA Gallery
    • PolyWogg AstroPhotography
    • Flickr Account
  • Reviews
    • Books
      • Book Reviews (all posts)
      • Book reviews by…
        • Book Reviews List by Date of Review
        • Book Reviews List by Number
        • Book Reviews List by Title
        • Book Reviews List by Author
        • Book Reviews List by Rating
        • Book Reviews List by Year of Publication
        • Book Reviews List by Series
      • Special collections
        • The Sherlockian Universe
        • The Three Investigators
        • The World of Nancy Drew
      • PolyWogg’s Reading Challenge
        • 2026
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2015, 2016, 2017
    • Movies
      • Master Movie Reviews List (by Title)
      • Movie Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Movie Reviews (all posts)
    • Music and Podcasts
      • Master Music and Podcast Reviews (by Title)
      • Music Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Music Reviews (all posts)
      • Podcast Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Podcast Reviews (all posts)
    • Recipes
      • Master Recipe Reviews List (by Title)
      • Recipe Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Recipe Reviews (all posts)
    • Television
      • Master TV Season Reviews List (by Title)
      • TV Season Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Television Premieres (by Date of Post)
      • Television (all posts)
  • About Me
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Me
    • Privacy Policy
    • PolySites
      • ThePolyBlog.ca (Home)
      • PolyWogg.ca
      • AstroPontiac.ca
      • About ThePolyBlog.ca
    • WP colour choices
  • Andrea’s Corner

Monthly Archives: August 2011

No, really, I watched “American Ninja Warrior” and liked it…

The PolyBlog
August 26 2011

So let me start by saying that just the name alone for this reality show made me cringe. And I honestly thought there was no possible way I would like it. But I hadn’t heard of it, read the description of the finale, and saw that it was competing in a Japanese game show around an obstacle course. I like watching the Wipeout! shows when they’re on, not so much for the actual wipeouts as just seeing the different obstacle courses and how people successfully approach them. It’s a couch potato fantasy to think it looks like fun, but I couldn’t possibly do them. American Ninja Warrior, or ANW as I found out the North American fans call it, is aimed at sending 10 competitors to a Japanese obstacle course called Sasuke. This game show has been on for a long time, now running its 27th “course”, and is the ultimate in obstacle courses — only three people in the entire history of the show have ever FINISHED the course (two fishermen and a shoe salesman). Just watching the athletes do it — or even train for it — is amazing. These are NOT couch potato athletes giving it a go, these are hard core extreme athletes expending every ounce of energy just to make it to the end.

The finale I watched was a two-hour finale and showed the 10 Americans competing. I don’t know if I would have watched the regular show (tryouts, boot camp training, etc.) and even the finale was driving me nuts with the boring profiles and interviews with the competitors — I had to fast-forward several times just to get to their actual attempt. But the competition itself was awesome.

Round 1

Step Slider

Round 1 starts with a simple obstacle called the Step Slider — you bounce from one sloped slide to another for four sides and you’re done. They make it look simple.

Next up is the Rolling Escargot — if you’ve ever seen someone in a circus strapped to a spinning wheel while someone throws knifes at them, that’s basically the spinning concept without the knifes. There is a round disc with four hand and foot holds on it; you climb on, and then use your own body control to roll it along a track, doing about 5-6 loops to get to the other platform. Some people did 3 and then launched themselves to the platform. More impressive, but straightforward.

The third obstacle is the Giant Swing, and yes, it’s a giant swing. No problem.

Jumping Spider #1

Fourth is called the Jumping Spider, and this one is impressive. You jump off a trampoline / launch to wedge yourself between two high barrels — and by wedge I mean you jump into the gap and extend your arms and legs out to the side to pin yourself between the two walls. No ledges, no holds, no grips — just the force of the limbs pushing out to hold you in place. You then crawl forward like a spider, forcing your limbs out to maintain your height between the walls, and travel through the walls about 30 feet, adjusting your height upwards to go over an obstacle wall about half-way through.

Obstacle five is called the Half-pipe Attack, and the theory is incredibly simple. You run along a curved wall (a half-pipe like a skateboarder would use), grab onto a rope and swing to a small platform. Not particularly complicated but it is a VERY small platform you are landing on, while swinging, and with momentum. If

Jumping Spider #2

you stick the landing, you then just run along a little platform to complete the obstacle. This obstacle provided the first problem for the American competitors when one of them landed wrong on the platform — imagine he landed and planted one foot, but he was swinging in an arc at the time, so the knee kept turning while the foot stopped. Bye-bye knee cap. And the guy tried to keep going.

Obstacle six looks like the simplest obstacle in terms of design. It is basically a curved wall — think of it as a circle, with two thirds of it missing. So you run backwards a bit to get some momentum, and then you barrel through the bottom and up the wall…and just as it starts to curve back on itself, you jump up (i.e. LUNGE!), grab the top with your hands, and pull yourself up. All of them handled it easily, so it looks simple, but most people would never even come close to reaching the top edge.

Half-Pipe Attack

Obstacle seven, the Spinning Bridge, was a new obstacle — four spinning balls suspended on rope. They look a bit like the Big Balls from a Wipeout! episode, but very close together and much smaller. In fact, they quickly realized the fastest way across was to run REALLY fast across, and even if you fall or stumble, your momentum carries you to the other platform.

Obstacle eight is relatively simple…You play Tarzan across a rope swing, grab on to a large rope mesh that serves as a rope ladder, and climb to the top where you can hit a buzzer to move on.

And oh, yeah, almost forgot. You have to do ALL OF THAT in 2 minutes, five seconds. 125 seconds. And with the exception of the guy who blew out his knee, the other nine competitors all made it. Some with 30-40 seconds to spare.

Curved Wall

Round 2

Round 2 makes the first round look like a warm-up, but there are only six obstacles in this one. You start with the Slider Drop…think of it as two slightly descending bars running parallel to each other for about 8 feet, and then they drop down about 3 feet and keep descending. Then you take a rod and put it across the top of the bars and hold on like you’re about to do a chin-up. The rod slides down the bars as they are angled down, but you have to keep your rod perpendicular to the bars as if one end slides off, down you drop — the rod isn’t attached, it is just sitting on top. When it hits the drop, you drop down too — ripping your arms out of the socket from the impact, and then you keep sliding. If you manage to keep balanced, you slide to the end and drop onto a platform.

Up until now, most people watching might think, hmm, maybe I could do that. Not technically complicated, so they think they might be able to do it. Then they hit obstacle 2, the Double-Salmon Ladder, and all doubt is removed from your mind. This one is physically impossible, and yet they do it. Picture a weightlifter lifting weight between two poles, and the poles have notches in them at various heights where you can rest the weight bar. Those are salmon ladders. Except that instead of the notches being at your ankles, knees, hips, shoulders, head, etc., they start at your head and go UP from there. And you’re the weight. So what you have to do is hold yourself on the rod going across like a weightlifter. And then, without your feet touching the ground or anywhere else for leverage, basically throw your body upwards so that the rod goes up in the air about 12 inches, and you can lodge it back in the next salmon ladder notch. Yep, you’re throwing yourself upwards through rocking / swinging momentum, climbing the ladder with just your upper body. Four rungs upwards. Then the “DOUBLE” part comes into play. You turn your body around, swing back and forth like a pendulum to build up momentum and then launch yourself forward to another salmon ladder about four feet in front of you. And you have to land the rod in the notches there. Some of the competitors managed to not only swing across the gap but also to swing themselves upward a level at the same time. Two more notches once you get there and you swing onto the next obstacle. I have to tell you, the Salmon Ladder totally blew my mind that anyone could do it at all. I’m sure they break at least two laws of physics with each jump.

The third obstacle is kind of simple in comparison, as is the fourth. Number 3 is the “unstable bridge” which is two boards about the size of doors lying flat and suspended from chains. Grab onto the first one with your hands (i.e. you hanging down underneath, a hand on each side) for the first board. It has four chains holding it in each corner, so pretty stable, but the second one is only suspended with two chains, so you have to jump your hands onto it from the previous board by grabbing both sides at the same time (i.e. again, rocking back and forth and then sliding your hands from the first board to the second board), and keeping them evenly distributed. Jump along with your hands (you can’t alternate or the board will tip) and then grab on to a platform at the end with your feet. Number 4, the Balance Tank, is a simple rolling metal log…you walk it down a sloped ramp, just keeping your balance and then grab onto a rope to pull you up to the start of obstacle 5.

Obstacle five is the great equalizer and is all about hand strength. For the Metal Spin, you run off a ledge, and leap outwards to grab onto one of several chains hanging down from a circle that will rotate from your added momentum and drop you onto the next platform. Here’s the problem — it is a BIG leap to that chain. And when you get there, you’re tired from the first obstacles. And you’re heavy and sweating. And you have to HOLD ON TO A METAL CHAIN WITH JUST YOUR HANDS! Absolutely brutal on the hands.

Up to this point, only 2 competitors were out — the blown knee guy from Round 1, and another guy who dropped off the slider drop obstacle as he didn’t keep his rod even on the sliders. So eight remained. Four more bit the dust on the chain, all of them failing to hang on and instead sliding off the end of the chain, most of them because there hands were too slick to hold on.

Obstacle six is relatively simple in format…there are three “walls” of wood that are on grooves, kind of like a guillotine after it has fallen. You run to the first wall, slide it up the groove out of your way, run underneath and drop it behind you. The first wall is 60+ pounds, the second 90+ pounds, and the third 120 pounds. Just all about brute strength, after you’ve done the other 5 obstacles and totally wrecked your upper body.

Again, I know what you are thinking. Okay, some of those are pretty difficult, but a lot of athletes could probably do them with some training. Sure. I don’t disagree. If they were tackled individually, or with multiple attempts. But these guys? The four who made it through? They had to do all six in a row, get it right on one attempt, and, oh yeah, it’s timed — they have to do it in under 90 seconds. NINETY seconds. That’s about the time it took you to READ my description of the round! And again, they had time to spare.

Round 3

For Round 3, there are 7 obstacles, but at the risk of spoiling the outcome, we only got to see competitors try the first three. The only benefit to the round is there is no time limit — you just have to complete it.

The first obstacle is called the Arm Bike. It is really simple looking — you have a set of bicycle pedals attached to a groove, and you pedal them across to the next obstacle. Except this is an obstacle course of great reknown, so you are using your ARMS to pedal the bike while holding yourself up, dangling below the pedal bike.

You then move on to obstacle two which is a bit like the Salmon Ladder except you are throwing yourself forward instead of upwards — you are suspended from a rod that sits in two grooves. When you throw yourself forward about four or five feet, the rod can land in two more grooves. Do this three or four times and you are through; miss a groove, or have your arms fall off, and you’re out.

The third — and ultimately final — obstacle was introduced three courses back and has yet to be completed by anyone. It is called the Ultimate Cliffhanger, although perhaps it is best thought of as the ultimate rock-climbing ledge. You hang by your fingertips on ledges about an inch wide and move from ledge to ledge to ledge, moving from left to right. The first ledge is angled upward to the right and you move upwards along it; then you transition to the second ledge above it which is also angled up but to the left. These are angled at about 30 degrees.The third and fourth ledges are simple, just straight across. All of the competitors made it to the third ledge and three even made it to the fourth ledge.

The fifth ledge is really small though, and lower than the fourth. So small in fact that it is almost impossible for both hands to be fully on it at the same time. Plus they have to almost “hop” from the fourth ledge to get to it. This is where two more competitors dropped, trying to transition. The sixth ledge is much like the third and fourth, so if you can get to it, you are back in familiar territory — except by this time, you probably have almost no upper body strength left. And no competitor has made it off the sixth ledge yet. The best American managed to get to about half-way across this last ledge, and even put his feet on the side of the platform, before dropping.

The Rest of the Course

We didn’t get to see the rest of the course, although the level was more of the same — heavy on upper body strength, but much easier elements than the cliffhanger. The final Round, #4, is a complete mystery as no one knows what the level looks like because they haven’t finished round 3 to get to it.

I doubt I’ll watch the week to week series next year, but I am DEFINITELY going to look out for the finale again. It was just amazing to watch these athletes do the course. Now, if only they could change the name of the program.

Posted in Television | Tagged 2011-12, ANW, ninja, reality, series, television, warrior | Leave a reply

SEO Update — more tools for authors…

The PolyBlog
August 15 2011

Further to my two earlier posts about Search Engine Optimization and authors, I found an interesting article over on “The Book Designer” by Joel Friedlander that has six tips for SEO improvements. Of the six, four of them are a bit unusual (first two and last two) and worthy of consideration.

The first (anchor text) is actually helpful for others to use for you — get them to use some text and the name of your sitedomain in their actual link (i.e. click on “this great site about books at mybooksite.com” rather than click “here”). However, you can use it in your own in-site links too. The second (link juice) is also about how other, more popular sites link to you.

The third and fourth (title tag, first paragraph) are standard fare and I’ve covered in more detail earlier.

The last two (link out, link deep) are about giving links to more information or resources on the topic. You have to be a bit careful with those as you start to look like a link farm if you don’t have a lot of other text to go with it, but some good information.

Check out his article (linked above) for much more detail…

Posted in Computers | Tagged computers, SEO, website, writing | Leave a reply

Previewing the 2011 fall TV season…

The PolyBlog
August 13 2011

Before I get to my analysis of the upcoming season, I have to confess three things up front. First and foremost, I am a TV junkie. I rarely get to the movies anymore, and I love serialized storytelling. So weekly shows are good for me. And a PVR makes my addiction all that much easier to manage. Digital taping? Check. East coast / west coast feeds? Check. Ability to fast-forward through stuff I don’t care about? Check. Ability to use programmable menu to adjust taping schedules? Check. Public acknowledgement of my addiction? Check.

Second, I prefer drama over comedies. With the exception of the Big Bang Theory, I haven’t found a mainstream “must-watch” comedy in years. Most of them rely on themes like “rational person in a sea of crazy people” or single-note stereotypes (Corner Gas and the clones) or let’s show a group of people who are blacker / whiter / fatter than somebody else cuz different is funny (Molly and Me) or men as morons (Two and a Half Men, Rules of Engagement, Everybody Loves Raymond, Home Improvement). Sure, they all have funny moments. But mostly they grate on my nerves like yesterday’s laugh track. And at 22 minutes long (without commercials), if I fast forward through the grating characters, there’s not much left to watch. So I usually pass on the comedies. Ditto for most reality shows, unless there’s a travel element (Amazing Race) or obstacles (Wipeout), but neither are “must-see” TV for me.

Third, I am willing to give a lot of schlocky things a chance if they have a chance of becoming interesting or at least entertaining. Often I only make it an episode or two and bail, but each September, I plan my TV schedule with the passion of a fantasy league for couch potatoes. This year? Not so much.

For returning shows, I will watch:

  • How I Met Your Mother — it was kind of lame at the start of last season, but picked up near the end…it’s not a lot funnier, just a bit more oomph in the storylines with issues like fatherhood and death. This year, the driving force will be who Barney marries at the end of the season and it will keep me around most weeks, but not necessarily every week. Prediction: Pickup for another season;
  • Castle — as an aspiring mystery writer, I love the premise (mystery writer teaming with detective) and the chemistry between the two leads can be great as long as they stay out of each other’s arms (they had a kissing scene last season that was supposed to be hot, but the acting by Stana Katic was laughable, although Nathan Filion did no better — note to writers: the longing is better than the having). The big topic for this year, although it might be resolved early, is Kate’s apparent “death” at the end of last season;
  • Hawaii Five-O — I thought this would suck last year but tuned in for an episode or two to try it out, and stuck around…probably will last another season, but doubtful for third, too much macho crap at times. But the season finale was fantastic with every character at loose ends;
  • NCIS — Gibbs is getting a bit long-in-the-tooth but the procedural part is still strong, and suspect that this will be the last season;
  • NCIS: LA — I like the extra action this one offers, although please stop Kenzi from trying to emote. And please don’t drag out the “who is Callan, really” for too long..prediction: potentially the last season;
  • Big Bang Theory — I think if I had to choose one show per week to watch, it might very well be this one…the writing is first-rate, and mixing it up last season to give Penny some female friends was great (without turning it into Friends-with-high-IQs). Plus I give props to Chuck Lorre as producer for ditching Charlie Sheen like the train wreck he is on that other show. Not much of a prediction to say almost guaranteed renewal.’;
  • Blue Bloods — I like Tom Selleck in this role, and Mark Wahlberg comes across great as a lead detective. I hated the Blue Templar wrap-up last season (should have been more detail much earlier in the season, and built to a climax) as way too easy to solve andit  will be interesting to see if the show can make it through mid-year cuts;
  • The Mentalist — I was a late arrival to the series, and in fact only started watching after enjoying Lie to Me (now cancelled) and Psych (which I can never find)…great season finale, looking forward to the new season to find out if it was indeed Red John that died;
  • Chuck — The network has announced only a handful of new episodes before it finishes for good, and with Morgan as the intersect, it may very well be pitiful. Might as well see the end though.
  • Nikita — Too many changes in the final episode for me, not sure the future will be bright with other viewers likely losing interest too;
  • Being Erica — This is a great Canadian show that has been picked up by the U.S. and has a decent future if it can figure out what the heck to do with Erica outside of her lovelife!;
  • Fringe — I liked X-Files but was not a full-fledged fan, yet Fringe captured me early on because of the female lead (Anna Torv) and J.J. Abrams’ original creation stamp; and,
  • Rookie Blue — Already launched for the new season, need to get back to the police storylines and away from Andi’s romance woes.

I also really like Psych, White Collar, In Plain Sight, and The Glades, but have trouble catching them reliably on my Canadian stations. Merlin and Torchwood are easier to find (on the Space channel), and I’m looking forward to Endgame, Lost Girl and Covert Affairs to pick up again on the specialty channels. All of which totals up to 18 returning shows to tape, and another four if/when I see them on the list. Total: 22 shows, 21 hours.

For new shows, I will give a shot to:

  • Alphas — this is a pseudo-“X-Men for TV” show although the abilities of the alphas are far less visually demonstrable (more down-to-earth than superhero) and has already started…I doubt it will survive the season, but I’ll give it a go in case a cult following grows, has some interesting bits so far;
  • Once Upon a Time — Storybrooke Maine becomes home to host of fairy tale characters. I have no idea if this premise will work, but it’s at least partially original. I’ll give it a go, but prediction is 4 EBIC;
  • Person of Interest — Similar to the Tom Cruise movie, Minority Report, based on the Phiip K. Dick story, the leads will be cops who can try to stop crimes before they occur. One of the downsides of the movie is you didn’t get to explore some of the ethos of being a preventative cop. Count me in, and I’m hoping for cult following.
  • Ringer — Sarah Michelle Gellar? Great! Playing twins? Umm, not so great. Has anyone seen a twin show that worked in the last 50 years? Didn’t think so. I’ll give it a go, but SMG isn’t exactly Meryl Streep and seeing her play twins might be more painful than entertaining. Prediction: 3 EBIC.
  • The Secret Circle — I am ashamed to say I watched Charmed even during the bad years (you know, every year it was on?). Witches are interesting. Cool even. So count me in. And I’m thinking there’s a chance of cult following. Prediction: Pickup, even by me.;
  • Unforgettable — I really like the premise of a detective who can remember everything. Sort of like Psych or The Mentalist or Lie to Me with a twist. And if the lead wasn’t Poppy Montgomery, who killed every episode of Without A Trace she led, I might have hopes. I doubt I can stick with this one, but I’ll give it a go. Prediction: 2 EBIC.”; and,
  • Whitney — not really sure where the episodes will go, but saw some trailers with Whitney talking about upcoming show, and she has some serious edge. I’m not familiar with her work, but if she can keep some sarcasm going, maybe it’ll be funny. I’ll give it a try, but my threshold for comedies is a bit high. Prediction: 3 EBIC;
  • Charlie’s Angels — Since Hawaii Five-0 survived the reboot, and Drew Barrymore is producing, I’ll take a shot. Prediction: 22 EBIC:
  • Grimm — Supernatural is still alive and well, err, alive anyway, so might have same demographic pull here. And has better chance at edgy stories over the Once Upon A Time. Prediction: 15 EBIC unless it finds some Fringe-like legs.

That makes another 9 shows, 8.5 hours of time. Other new shows that will go straight to a “pass” for me are:

  • 2 Broke Girls — If the best thing you can say is that it is a “modern-day Laverne and Shirley”, then I’m going to ditch it for The L Word or something else with a bit of edge…prediction: 8 episodes before I’d cancel (EBIC);
  • American Horror Story — People buy a haunted house? Yawn…prediction: 3 EBIC;
  • Enlightened — Interesting, character going from rehab to spreading new approach to life? Sounds interesting…oh, wait, stars Laura Dern. Prediction: 2 EBIC;
  • Free Agents — Hank Azaria in a lead for romantic comedy? Tuesdays with Morrie and Herman’s Head setup some respect, but nope. Prediction: 3 EBIC;
  • A Gifted Man — Doctor talks to dead wife…pretty sure, Eli Stone (lawyer and visions) was already done. Prediction: 3 EBIC;
  • H8R — Ordinary joes explain to celebs why nobody likes them? A train wreck of a premise that will likely have some eyeballs even with D list participants… Prediction: pickup by network but I would cancel before even one episode
  • Hart of Dixie — new doctor finds life is about more than money while in smalltown America. Paging Dr. Hollywood? Snooze. Prediction: 5 EBIC;
  • Hell on Wheels — historical revenge western with railroad construction as the plot driver…umm, I can’t think of five thematic words that say CANCEL ME NOW more than that. Prediction: 1 EBIC;
  • Homeland — Intelligence officers and Mandy Patinkin. Sorry, those words don’t sing to me. And once you solve the initial mystery, where do you go? Prediction: 2 EBIC.
  • How to Be a Gentleman — Like the 2 Broke Girls, this is update of “Odd Couple”. Focusing on men behaving doofusly. Pass, prediction: 1 EBIC.
  • I Hate My Teenage Daughter — I’ve read the description of this one three times and still have no idea what it’s about other than mother daughter issues. Pass, prediction: 0 EBIC.
  • Last Man Standing — Tim Allen is back as a home husband. I like Tim’s stand-up, but he’s a tool in most shows. Pass again, prediction: 1 EBIC.
  • Man Up! — getting in touch with their macho side. Which the actors can do while playing golf, as their schedules should open up after three episodes — Prediction: 3 EBIC;
  • New Girl — Zooey Deschanel in some sort of Three’s Company parody but with three guys instead of two girls? I have no idea how this premise works, but with Zooey guesting everywhere, someone apparently wants her on TV. Not me, but someone. Prediction: Pickup by the network, 2 EBIC.
  • Pan Am — Mad Men, with stewardesses. And Christina Ricci as the lead. I am soooo not there. Prediction: 1 EBIC.
  • The Playboy Club — Mad Men, but at the Playboy Club. Maybe it will surprise people by becoming a pseudo-Sopranos type show, but it will need to amp up the sex or violence pretty fast or disappear. Prediction: 3 EBIC.
  • Prime Suspect — female cop in male-dominated world. And I’m supposed to care why? Prediction: 1 EBIC.
  • Revenge — pretty little wench seeks revenge on country club set. Maybe the Gossip Girl set will chime in, and the networks will pick it up. Personally, 2 EBIC.
  • Suburgatory — Oooh, let’s move to the country or the ‘burbs where it is safe and my daughter won’t get knocked up. Fish out of water shouldn’t last long. Prediction: 2 EBIC;
  • Terra Nova — Dinosaurs? Spielberg? Time travel? What doesn’t this show have? Me watching it. I’m pretty sure I’ve seen the movie and three other TV shows with same premise over the last few years. None worth watching. Prediction: 3 EBIC.
  • Up All Night — Christina Applegate. Parenthood. Hoorah. Pass: prediction, 1 EBIC.
  • The X Factor — Oh, look, it’s So You Think You Can Be Discovered singing/dancing/acting/something with a contest. I don’t watch any of those contests and I won’t watch this one either. Prediction: The network will pick it up, everyone will complain about Simon Cowell, and I’ll miss every episode very happily. Prediction: 0 EBIC.

For a grand total, ta da (!!!), of 31 shows and 29.5 hours of programming to try. While that sounds like a lot, there were over 45 shows to try last year, closer to 50 in September. Not including mid-year replacements. So, down about 40%. Which is all good for managing my addiction.

Posted in Television | Tagged 2011-12, fall, premiere, series, television | 5 Replies

Countdown to Retirement

Days

Hours

Minutes

Seconds

Retirement!

One of my favourite sites

And it's new sister site

My Latest Posts

  • More workplanning on my new Calibre libraryMarch 28, 2026
    I wrote earlier this week (Using Calibre to embrace my inner librarian for ebooks) about the Poly Library 3.0, and when I did, I thought I had most of my “work” done. I had decided on three main areas (the book profile, user engagement, and user tools), although, truth be told, I had four categories … Continue reading →
  • An update on Jacob…March 24, 2026
    For those of you who don’t know, as I didn’t blog about this much before, Jacob decided to have surgery on his legs this year, which he did at the end of February. I’ve held off posting anything as I didn’t want to ask Jacob what he was comfortable with me sharing, but today was … Continue reading →
  • Using Calibre to embrace my inner librarian for ebooksMarch 23, 2026
    I have used Calibre literally for years to manage all my ebooks. It started way back when Kindle was doing a huge business of people pushing freebies of their ebooks. Some good, some slush, all free. But it meant a LOT of ebooks to manage. So I tried a couple of programs, most of which … Continue reading →
  • What would you put in a personal health dashboard / framework?March 8, 2026
    I started this year with a few short plans to work on health factors in my life. Some of it was prescribed; I needed a physical exam for certain pension forms. Others were ones that I was trying to do some proactive work on, like my teeth and my feet. And still others were more … Continue reading →
  • Book clubs 2026-03: Options for MarchMarch 8, 2026
    February wasn’t as productive as I had hoped, at least not for my “bookclub reading”. I had 28 from book clubs below as potential reads, but my Christmas present hangover reads occupied most of my attention, plus some non-reading projects. Oh, and life itself, I guess. I read This Book Made Me Think of You … Continue reading →

Archives

Categories

© 1996-2025 - PolyWogg Privacy Policy
↑