↓
 

The PolyBlog

My view from the lilypads

  • Home
  • Goals
    • Goals (all posts)
    • #50by50 – Status of completion
    • PolyWogg’s Bucket List, updated for 2016
  • Life
    • Family (all posts)
    • Health and Spiritualism (all posts)
    • Learning and Ideas (all posts)
    • Computers (all posts)
    • Experiences (all posts)
    • Humour (all posts)
    • Quotes (all posts)
  • Photo Galleries
    • PandA Gallery
    • PolyWogg AstroPhotography
    • Flickr Account
  • Reviews
    • Lilypad Library (Books)
      • Book Reviews (all posts)
      • Book reviews by…
        • Book Reviews List by Date of Review
        • Book Reviews List by Number
        • Book Reviews List by Title
        • Book Reviews List by Author
        • Book Reviews List by Rating
        • Book Reviews List by Year of Publication
        • Book Reviews List by Series
      • Special collections
        • The Sherlockian Universe
        • The Three Investigators
        • The World of Nancy Drew
      • PolyWogg’s Reading Challenge
        • 2026
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2015, 2016, 2017
    • Movies
      • Master Movie Reviews List (by Title)
      • Movie Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Movie Reviews (all posts)
    • Music and Podcasts
      • Master Music and Podcast Reviews (by Title)
      • Music Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Music Reviews (all posts)
      • Podcast Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Podcast Reviews (all posts)
    • Recipes
      • Master Recipe Reviews List (by Title)
      • Recipe Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Recipe Reviews (all posts)
    • Television
      • Master TV Season Reviews List (by Title)
      • TV Season Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Television Premieres (by Date of Post)
      • Television (all posts)
  • About Me
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Me
    • Privacy Policy
    • PolySites
      • ThePolyBlog.ca (Home)
      • PolyWogg.ca
      • AstroPontiac.ca
      • About ThePolyBlog.ca
    • WP colour choices
  • Andrea’s Corner

Category Archives: Computers

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Planning for my new hobby

The PolyBlog
April 24 2022

I probably don’t need yet another hobby, but I’ve become fascinated with 3D printing in the last year, and some of the things I can do. Some of them are an extension of not being very handy with power tools or woodworking options. I need something that is more “design and print” then “design and build”.

Over the last few months, I’ve waffled. Do I wait until life returns to normal after Andrea’s chemo? Except life is never “normal”. There’s always “something” that would suggest waiting. I am forcing myself to at least finish cleaning up the basement before bringing another project downstairs, and I’m slowly working on it.

But in my spare time, I’ve been trying to figure out what the 3D printer hobby will look like, even as simple as which printer to get.

On the plus side, there’s a good local place with well-reviewed support options. Some people just order kits online, which doesn’t really interest me, and there’s some irony in there. Starting on a DIY hobby where I don’t want to do the initial setup myself. Hmm.

Nevertheless, I visited them a few months ago, decided on the most likely printer to choose. They are cheaper than I expected, expecting to pay around $800, but I’ll likely get out for under $500. Not including supplies of course.

But the part that is messing with my squirrel-brain is NOT the actual 3D printing. It’s how to do multiple colours.

You know what they say about assumptions

When I started looking at this, I saw lots of multiple colour prints. Marvin the Martian, chess boards, Disney characters, etc. I am curious to do a Jiminy Cricket as a throw-back to my youth and to compare it to a statue I have in ceramic that a friend painted for me almost 30 years ago. And under the general info I had, and what I saw, I assumed that a 3D printer kind of worked like a colour inkjet printer. You put in multiple colours of filament, and out came a multiple colour print.

Nope. Almost all hobby printers are monochromatic. They print in one colour at a time. Technically, they say that it has a “single extruder” to paint the print with filament. But it means the equivalent of one ink cartridge at a time.

Now, here’s the fun part. If you WANT multiple colours, there are generally five ways to do it. Are you ready for them? I wasn’t.

A. Upgrade to a multi-extruder printer

That seemed obvious to me, a simple upgrade. If you have a monochrome paper printer, and you want colour, you get a different printer that can print colour. But hold on there. A multi-extruder printer is not as simple as choosing one with multiple heads nor simply changing heads to combine things. No, that would be too easy. Some have two, some have four, some have eight, but each time you go up, the printers get more complicated, more expensive, and often have more things to go wrong…all of which means your user experience gets complicated. Oh. Well, sheepdip. I do NOT want to over complicate my user experience. I was looking for simple.

B. Change filament during the print

This is the obvious approach. While it’s not QUITE the same, it’s kind of like printing a page in a normal printer, and when you want to switch from black ink to red ink, the printer pauses, you switch the cartridge, and it prints the next part, and then tells you when it’s ready to go back to black so you can switch the cartridge again.

Of course, 3D printers don’t really have cartridges, they have filament going into them. And you have to tell the printer when you want it to switch filaments — basically coding the print job so it pauses, beeps at you, has you change the filament being fed into it, waits until you tell it to to continue, does the next segment, and bob’s your uncle, it beeps to tell you to go back to the old one again.

That’s a bit annoying, but manageable, and it keeps everything linear, right? Except it’s not like paper, because you’re printing in three dimensions, a thin layer at a time. So, think of it like say a cube with 20 layers of black at the bottom, and then 20 layers with one half white and one half red, and then 20 more layers there are black again. In an ideal scenario, I would do layers 1-20 of black (which is true, it would do that). Then I would like to switch colours and do layers 21-40 of white (the back half of the cube), switch colours, and then layers 21-40 of red (the front half of the cube), switch back to black, and then do layers 41-60 of black again. It can’t do that.

It can do the first twenty layers (1-20) in black, just normal. But on layer 21, where the back half is white and the front half is red, it would need a colour change from black to white (still the same) AND then a colour change from white to red to do the front half of the layer. Then it would do layer 22. It can’t do 21-40 of one colour and then 21-40 of another, it has to do layer 21 x 2 colours, layer 22 x 2 colours, etc. With the colour change for every layer up to 40. So you CAN do it. But if you were doing something multi colour — perhaps a Simple Simon video game layout where you would have four different colours on the same layer, plus a form colour, that would be at least 5 filament changes for each micro-layer (where a microlayer might be only a couple of mm thick).

In other words, no, I can’t do really complicated prints directly in multiple colours. Don’t even get me started on the idea of a chessboard. 64 squares of two colours? Plus several layers of thickness? Yikes.

C. Use different materials

This is a lot more complicated, and in some ways is not much different than the multi-extruder option. But instead of using the same type of filament all the way through, you can use different materials of different colours within the print. If I thought colour changes were hard, printers that can do multi-material prints are way more complicated than I’m ready to handle.

D. Make it in pieces

If I go back to the chessboard idea, most people make the 64 squares of two colours in two separate sets of squares — one in one colour and one in another — and then “assemble” them together. So kind of like assembling 64x2x2 square lego bricks side by side on a pegboard. It’s a bit more complicated than that of course, with some people doing it with glue, others using overlapping tabs like models, others making a frame for it to sit snugly in, or others creating ways for the pieces to snap together. Of course, there are ways to attach parts together using external fasteners too, or some people actually put lego-like snaps on the bottom of prints so they can attach to other things. Literally snapping together.

I’m not quite sure how I feel about this one yet. When I was young, I had no interest in models that you put together with glue. I didn’t mind “snap together” options, but gluing? That was way too fiddly for my thick, uncoordinated fingers. These parts won’t be that small, but there is an aspect there that makes me pause. On the other hand, model glue was enough of a deterrent all on its own, and most people use bond or epoxy now from the dollar store.

E. Paint it

Okay, so this is the one that is driving me around the bend. I am not a painter. I have done a few ceramic things, not enough to develop any skill at it, and what I make tends to look like it was painted by a semi-talented four-year-old who was in a hurry. 3D printing can make some amazing models. But if I then have to paint them? Hell, I might as well just buy them.

Yet everyone says the same thing, “Just paint ’em, it’s easy”. And there are some tools available now that weren’t before. Very tiny hobby brushes are common place now, sure. But most people say to use paint pens. I didn’t even know there were such things, but apparently Michael’s has four different kinds! First, they have professional quality, that they keep in a locked cabinet, which come in a wide variety of palettes and nib sizes. Second, they have more hobbyist quality, with three sizes of nibs — basically fine/small, medium, broad/large. Both the professional ones and the hobbyist ones come in acrylic or oil paints. And there are some decent collections on Amazon too, of course.

I have watched a few videos, it looks easy enough, but it will obviously take practice to get any skill. And I say “will” instead of “would”, because it pretty much is the main option open to me. I’m going to have to learn to paint stuff. Some people buy a small air brush, others use spray paint for larger models. I saw some real cool stuff done with a small spraycan on a model to get a really good even coat to make a Disney like character. It’s DOABLE. I just hope that I like doing it enough to actually make it worthwhile.

Taking the plunge

I’m taking the plunge on May 6. Fingers crossed that it works. While I can’t really wrap my around the five options above completely, I’m going with the same printer I originally chose. I considered going with a smaller one — smaller investment in case it doesn’t work out. I considered an alternate one with multi-extruders, but the reviews are not kind for a bunch of complications. And I considered going up in level of machine, none of which anyone else recommends. So I’m going with the Gantry Pro.

My overall rallying thought, and why I have put time into trying to pre-load my brain with the right parameters, is that 3D printing has a lot in common with astronomy and photography. The best gear is the gear you will actually use.

But I’m having to let go of the options a little bit. On the plus side, the worst-case scenario is that I try it and it doesn’t really work for me. So, as a result, I might end up selling the printer within a year.

I’m okay with that. At least I’m trying something new. And I’m hoping Jacob is interested too. We’ll see.

Posted in Computers | Tagged 3D printing, learning | Leave a reply

When Apple misunderstands the assignment

The PolyBlog
April 17 2022

I’m not an Apple fanboy by any stretch of the imagination. I run PCs, not MACs, and I used to have an Android phone and tablet. I switched to an iPhone for three reasons. First, I wanted to do some astrophotography through my telescope, and the best app to do that with is only on iOS (NightCap, for those who are interested). Second, Andrea and Jacob were moving into the world of such tools, and since I provide tech support to them, I wanted things to work as seamlessly as possible without being complicated…which is definitely an Apple selling point since they lock everything down within an inch of its life.

But the third reason, and it isn’t me being a fanboy, just admiring when something is done well, their phones and tablets are slick as anything. There’s a reason why they have such huge market share, they just work. Relatively well too, with a lot of time and effort put into how consumers interact. They may not be able to customize anything for you, but if you want it in the base colours they have, great.

So it surprised me when I had an issue with the way they did something recently that shouldn’t happen in a relatively well-run company.

Let’s start with the simple scenario — we have Apple Music as the family subscription. Andrea, Jacob and I are all on the plan, we all get unlimited Apple Music play. Which I use extensively for music at times. On top of that, I have iCloud (as does Andrea) for backups, AND I also use Apple Arcade. It adds a few dollars a month, under $20 in total with Apple Music family.

But we also have VMedia, Netflix, Prime and Disney+. I sometimes add on specialty channels like BBC Canada to watch a specific show I want for a month or two, or in this case, I decided to add Apple+ TV.

Which SEEMED like a relatively simple idea. I browsed on the TV, it gave me an option to bundle the four services together — Music, TV, iCloud and Arcade — all in Famly mode, and while it would individually run $22+, you save a few bucks bundling, it comes out to $20 or so. Great. Easy peasy lemon squeezy, I click, it does its bit, it synchs everything, adds it to my service, sends me a confirmation, and I watch Slow Horses, a new show on Apple + TV with Gary Oldman as a grouchy old spy running some screwups in MI5.

Then, the next morning, I get a confirmation from Apple saying, “Thanks for subscribing, here’s your bill for the first month”. $20. Wait a minute. I already PAID to May 12 for Family Music. Now I’m paying for Apple TV to overlap that for $20 INCLUDING Music / iCloud / Arcade. If I had just got Apple Music, it would have been only $5.99. Nothing in the email indicates that there’s anything existing already on my account for the same time frame. In fact, when I go to the subscription services, it has bundled everything (as it should have), and it is showing, yes indeed, I’m paying $20 to get to May 15th or so.

WTH?

So I go in, go to the subscription, ask to cancel the charge and that the reason is “it didn’t work the way I thought it would” (a wonderfully lovely way that would also capture every user error option too), and I look for where I can type in my explanation of double billing. Nada. Okay, it must be on the next screen? Nope, it submits it with no option to explain. Frak.

On to the help chat. Daniel was very helpful, but could do nothing. He explained that although I received nothing ANYWHERE that would have told me this, I would have (supposedly) received another email later this month that refunded the prorated portion for the other services. Uh huh. I mean, it makes SENSE, sort of, but why wouldn’t the original click buttons tell me that OR the confirmation email OR the invoice? A simple note to say, “Oh, btw, there’s a good chance this looks like we double-billed you, but well, we didn’t, not really, stay tuned.”

Sooooo, I ask Daniel to cancel my refund request. Oh, no, he can’t do that, he doesn’t have that power. Which means the solution is:

a. I wait for the refund to come through;

b. I go back in, resubscribe to the bundled option (Apple One Family) because it not only took OUT Apple One Family, it also didn’t put the others BACK because my initial subscription/bundle would have cancelled them being separate and the refund didn’t undo that; and,

c. Wait for a future email with my refunded difference.

Umm, okay.

I waited. This morning, I got the refund notification. Great, go back in, yep, all the other subscriptions are “gone” (without any refund notification for those, btw), and I choose Apple One Family. And it tells me THIS time, oh, btw, there’s a free month with it. Well, great, then I don’t care if they refund me. Perfect, let’s do it.

Click, click, click.

Confirmation. All good.

Three hours later? I get a receipt from Apple. They charged me for the full month again anyway. Sigh.

I saved the chat log from the help desk exchange. It VERY clearly says I will get another refund. I don’t care HOW they do it. I just want to pay only once. Why is Apple making that difficult? They are, generally speaking, WAY better at these interfaces and exchanges than this would appear.

So why are they screwing up this simple combo that likely applies to just about EVERY customer they have?

Posted in Computers | Leave a reply

Feeling shallow on the lighter side of life

The PolyBlog
April 1 2022

While my blog of late has been dealing with lots of more serious matters than normal, I am still trying to keep it “light” with some ME time. I’ve mentioned before that I play various games on my phone, and of late, that’s mainly one of 9:

a. Traffic Puzzle is still a popular choice for me, although I lost a bit of interest when I cracked the 2000+ board mark, and actually caught up to where their new content ran out. I actually had to wait for new boards to be released. I’m at 2453 now, and I think they’re likely somewhere around 2600, but I’m not actively trying to catch up. I do a board or two every few days. Somewhere there was a run on free rewards, and I now have so many, I could literally play nothing but powerups for about four boards (I wouldn’t, but I could).

b. Penguin Isle was something I thought was cute, with a base to develop with lots of little penguins running around. The downside is that while it is cute, there’s not much to do, and once you get past a certain level, the delays between levels is HUGE. I only play once a day anymore, if that, but it could be weeks to the next level up. Not a lot of “fun”, just grinding.

c. I have three games I use for quick distractions — Super Yatzy has six dice instead of five, and some extra things to aim for; Euchre is similar for duration, although it is either too easy (the opposition is on the highest level, but they frequently don’t lead trump to clear stray trumps from taking aces) or it is ridiculously hard (they make it every hand, including with 3 low cards and no bowers, but their partner has both, cuz that’s not suspicious); and Farkle, another dice game, although not super exciting by yourself.

d. I was really excited previously about Lily’s Garden and Penny & Flo, but after I got through some speed story, it has become agonizingly slow with very little happening. It feels more like a soap opera than the adventure book it was resembling.

So where does that leave me these days? Well, I tried out a new game called Trainstations 2. And I am relatively obsessed with it. Most of the “actions” you can do is either picking up freight or delivering it, or generating stuff in factories, and as I’ve advanced, some of the activities take about an hour to complete. Apparently, this is a great source of frustration to other players, but I have no issues at all. I’m happy to play for 5 minutes or so, send trains off to do their thing, and come back a few hours later. Jacob is playing too, but I’ll play through the day, take a break here or there or at lunch, while he only usually plays for a bit after school. It isn’t particularly challenging, relatively mindless, but it is diverting.

But while all of those games are relatively innocuous, it is NOT the one that is making me feel shallow.

Instead, that honour goes to…drumroll please…the Microsoft Solitaire Collection.

Every day, the MS team releases five new “daily challenges” ranging individually from easy to medium to hard to expert for five different solitaire games.

Klondike is the classic solitaire that everyone knows and loves or hates. Easy and medium are way too easy, even hard is usually relatively straightforward. But often the hard or expert ones will come down to a choice of two cards to play, and if you play one, you win, while if you go with the other one, it likely ends in a stalemate. So you back up and go to the other one. I rarely if ever miss a Klondike game in the daily challenge, but there are hundreds of extra games available in the collection for you to “practice”, so to speak.

The second game is Spider solitaire. On easy and medium, it is one colour/suit; on hard and expert, it is two colours/suits. I have played Spider solitaire for years, and it is one of my favourite e-versions to play. Once in a rare while, I can get stuck, but it doesn’t usually take me much to get “unstuck”. I had one a few days ago, and it was really challenging right up until the last draw from the pile, I think I had cleared about two rows out of ten before I ran out of draws, and still managed to solve the deck.

The fourth game (yes I skipped #3) is Pyramid solitaire, and it isn’t a challenge for me on ANY level. I can do them with my eyes closed. There are only a couple of things that can mess me up, and if I miss something, I almost always know why and how to fix it on a replay. Most of the time, I only get in trouble if I’m trying to go too fast and not really paying attention. Some people hate pyramid, but there’s symmetry in it for me and I find it highly relaxing.

Similarly for game #5, TriPeaks. It’s a BIT trickier at times, some of the expert ones can bite me in the butt, but I can usually go a slightly different direction earlier in the round, and make a difference to the end.

So where does that leave me to be “challenged”? Game #3 — FreeCell. I have consistently sucked at FreeCell for years. There was just something about it that I’d play, and without fail, I’d get stuck. Now, the MS collection has the advantage that it ONLY posts challenges that are actually solvable, unlike some other games that just give you a random deal (no different than dealing paper versions yourself), so you KNOW with this version that it CAN be solved. You just missed something.

I’ve played MS Solitaire on and off for about three years. It comes with Windows, you can play direct from the browser or install the app, but it wasn’t until probably January that I realized they have an app version. Of course they do, duh. And it is totally synchable with your MS account so I can play on laptop or desktop or phone, and it is completely synched. I pretty much ONLY play on my phone now, but still, I COULD play on other devices.

In previous years or months, with five puzzles a day and about 30 days per month, that gives about 150 puzzles for the month if you want to get perfect. And now it is time for the really shallow part.

About 3 years ago, I would regularly get about 120/150 in a month. I didn’t play consistently every day on my desktop, but if you miss a day, you can go back and fill in the gaps. I regularly would end up playing about 10d in the month, so every one of those days, I had to play 3d worth of games. Last year, I played a couple of months consistently in a row, and I bumped my score up to almost 140 / 150. There were always a handful I couldn’t get that were almost all FreeCells, and then perhaps a wonky Klondike one or something.

But when I started playing in January on the phone, I played a bunch of these other collections too. It levels you up with your gameplay, and I’ve raised myself up to about level 50-70 for all of them, which is nothing compared to the hard core fans who are well above 1000 in their game levels. I’m shallow, but I’m not crazy. At least not in that way. Maybe.

I missed under 10 in January. In February, I tried REALLY hard, and I missed about four or so. There is a FB group — I mean, why not? — and someone posts SOLUTIONS there for really hard ones. So I checked them out, looked at the solutions to get a perfect month, but it isn’t really a perfect month if I had to cheat, right? But here’s the funny thing. When I looked at the solutions for the FreeCell ones, I picked up a few tricks that I likely wouldn’t have figured out on my own.

The game play is VERY different from the other four games, and there’s actually a bunch of gameplay theorists out there who study optimization techniques tied to FreeCell. I noticed in the solutions that often they will run a suit to the stack quite high, something you would almost never do in Klondike for example, at least not without it likely messing you up. Equally, even when there are obvious lines of advancement sometimes, it’s better to try and get really long runs in one or two columns, leaving the others with room to move. Again, that often bites you in the behind in Klondike and a few others. Plus, Pyramid and Tripeaks, and even Spider to some extent, require a general symmetry to most of the solutions. FreeCell embraces asymmetry for many of the solutions. And I’m learning.

For March, I only missed ONE game all month, an Expert FreeCell early in the month. I almost wish I hadn’t looked up the solution, as I think I could probably get it now.

And I am ridiculously tickled pink by my performance. Seriously, it’s SOLITAIRE. Why do I care? I have no idea.

But it is a bit of brainpower applied to permutation and combinations theory, and as I said, I’m learning. If I get a perfect month in April, what will I get out of it? Almost nothing. It pops up with a little “ta da” sound, and it says, “Congrats, you got perfect this month!”. No ticker tape parade, no prize in the game. In fact, there are a LOT of cheaters in the games … they show the leaderboards, and it is not uncommon for the scores to say that the person who came in first overall for the day managed to solve the five games in 3 minutes. It is literally not possible, they could barely click that fast, let alone solve it, and there have been some with solutions down to barely a minute. Apparently, they are coders who create bots that play for them…they treat it as a coding challenge to look at the cards, choose an optimal strategy, and let the AI play for them.

I don’t know what they get out of that, as they aren’t tweaking the AI every day, they’re just letting it run every day for giggles I guess. But who am I to judge? My mood is controlled way too much by whether or not I got all five of the day’s challenges on the first try.

I really am quite shallow.

Posted in Computers | Leave a reply

Reading “Make: Getting started with 3D Printing” (Chapter 1: Introduction)

The PolyBlog
February 6 2022

I’m reading an ebook called “Make: Getting started with 3D Printing” (Second Edition, by Liza Wallach Kloski and Nick Kloski) as part of my learning about 3D printers ahead of buying one later this year.

The foreword served as a general introduction (Reading “Make: Getting started with 3D Printing” (foreword)), so I was a little surprised that Chapter 1 had the same title. It is, however, an incredibly short chapter that wants to argue that 3D printing is the corner store of a third industrial revolution after steam-powered machines and assembly lines. The obvious benefits are that 3D printers are incredibly amenable to having scalable workforces (start small, and build…literally) as you produce one unit, multiple units or in large quantities and with the opportunity for customization that traditional assembly lines can’t accommodate. It also might work well with the recent push for “work anywhere” i.e., no location restrictions on where the “factory” has to be in order to run. The book was written before the current big pushes, but there are some obvious synergies.

Personally, I’m not sold on viewing it as a third revolution, although it would be a part of it. For me, it is the digital world that is the third revolution, the move to digital products and away from physical ones, or the multi-faceted nature of the modern “factory”.

What I do like however is a really great quote:

…3D printing gives power to the individual. Essentially, it is a factory on your desk; you can model an idea and 3D print the object the same day. You can manifest your concepts into a physical form which was only once available through expensive, exclusive, and time-consuming industrial prototyping. You don’t need permission from a board of directors, or even orders from customers, to produce new products. You just need your imagination and a pool of plastic.

(p.4)

An interesting thought, and it is entirely true. It is ideal for the startup or small-scale entrepreneur. Will it generate a “revolution”? I think not.

Posted in Computers | Leave a reply

Reading “Make: Getting started with 3D Printing” (Foreword)

The PolyBlog
February 5 2022

I have formally started my learning process for 3D printing, hoping sometime this year to buy one and start making things. I jumped ahead in the learning queue back at the start of January, and I think I already know which model I am likely to buy (ADIMLab Gantry Pro). However, some of the variables are still mysteries to me, and I picked up a few ebooks plus a paper non-fiction title to help with my early learning. The book I am reading is called “Make: Getting started with 3D Printing”, Second Edition, by Liza Wallach Kloski and Nick Kloski.

I’m so new to the topic, I’m even learning stuff in the foreword. It is written as an introduction to 3D printing and the history, arguing that like many new technologies, 3D printing has followed the “hype cycle” mapping visibility over time — the initial technology trigger, a large peak of inflated expectations followed by a trough of disillusionment, and then it rises back up a “slope of enlightenment” to level off on the Plateau of Productivity.

The authors argue that 3D printing has reached the plateau already, but I’m not as convinced of that yet. Part of the challenge is that these types of graphs are actually more like “averages” of multiple people, multiple industries, even multiple sub-disciplines where one group is still in the initial hype stage, while other more mature models have levelled off. I’m not ready to pronounce where I think it is for home hobbyists, which is my only real interest.

I certainly see the value to entrepreneurs of the ability to produce prototypes. There are many excited people in the field who think everything is wonderful, they’ll be able to print 1000s of products, and will retire. Until they realize that 3D printing is generally great at producing unique items or prototypes, or even a series of similar products for individual use. But it is difficult to take it to large-scale production with small printers as it just takes so long to print stuff. If you build an exciting new product, and it changes an industry, generating thousands and thousands of orders, but it takes you 3d to print it, you’re in trouble, because your single printer will only be able to generate about 120 copies per year.

Sure, you can buy MORE printers. But in many cases, it would be more efficient if you could do injection moulding. Which doesn’t rule out 3D printing — you COULD design the moulds in a 3D printer and cast it in something else that then is used for the moulds. As an example. And many of the online fora for newbies, like myself, are filled with the newly converted entrepreneur who sees this as their way to take over the world. Not unlike the new web designer who thinks if they can launch a thousand websites selling a few products each, and they simply use SEO, bright graphics and fast sites, they’ll start receiving millions of orders a day for their relative crap products. And then they start realizing that web design is harder than they thought and that they’ll have to earn the money they thought would just “arrive” in their inbox.

For me, my needs are simple, so I’m probably on the slope of enlightenment. I got excited, I saw some opportunities, it crashed a bit as I realized the time it takes to do a lot of the prints, and the manual nature of managing a printer, handling the maintenance, etc. My interests are around personal gadgets, doodads that make activity X or Y easier…hacks, if you will. Some of that extends into specific interests for astronomy. And I want to do some DIY projects for eyepieces. In my most hopeful times, I dream of 3D printing most of the elements for a DIY telescope (or 3 or 4 styles of telescope). But I also want to do some board game design. It would be prototyping if we were going to mass produce them, but these are more just fun for us. Jacob has some ideas, and likes doing it, so my role will be more turning his designs into a working version. I’m not looking to sell products on Etsy or start making things for other people. Just me. And with the printer cost ranging from C$220 for a simple one and about C$450 for a mid-range one, that’s eminently doable as a new hobby.

But I digress, I’m supposed to be talking about what I’m reading.

The history of 3D printing surprised me, as it noted that a form of it has been around since the 1980s. I thought it was much more recent than that, perhaps because it notes that 2009 was the time when it started to come together with open source tools for enthusiasts.

People have asked me about 3D printers given my new interest, all with the same initial question as me of “how do they work”. I really liked the description in the book similar to that of a hot glue gun melting the glue in its situation and dropping a bead; similarly, the 3D printer heats up filament, essentially making it a liquid, and it too “beads” in small layers onto a surface, hardening as it cools. I knew that the types of printers I was looking at were called FDM but I didn’t know what the letters stood for — fused deposition modeling. It fuses the filament, deposits it in layers, and voila, modeling. Makes perfect sense. I won’t use the FFF acronym (fused filament fabrication), although it too is probably a good way to remember how everything works.

As I mentioned, I’ve already had some disillusionment from my initial spark of interest, and the book mentions some of the “reality check” that I’ve already experienced. Namely, knowing that:

  • 3D prints fail — not all of them work perfectly the first, second or even twelfth time, it takes practice and adjustments for the individual printer and filament type;
  • 3D prints take a long time — this definitely disillusioned me, as I had thought a bunch of the things could be done in an hour;
  • 3D printers need ongoing maintenance — this is what worries me the most as I’m not mechanically inclined, and I was stressed reading about DIY kits, levelling challenges, special beds, etc., although one visit to the local store convinced me most of my concerns were exaggerated;
  • Sometimes 3D prints need pre- and post-processing — this is the one that disillusioned me the most as I have very little interest in painting, for example, to make things look cool. I was hoping that I could just print in different colours instead, but that is not as easy as I first hoped.

And so, that’s where I am in my learning. I look forward to reading Chapter 1, the “introduction”.

Posted in Computers | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Countdown to Retirement

Days

Hours

Minutes

Seconds

Retirement!

One of my favourite sites

And it's new sister site

My Latest Posts

  • A red-eyed tree frog wearing a panda apron is stirring food in the Lilypad Kitchen.
    Leveling up – Three kitchens, one frogMay 28, 2026
    Let me start with a confession. I only have 12 recipes on the website. Not much of a start, right? But this is part of my anal-retentive side. I like to curate recipes, find some good ones, and then put them on my blog. Except that I have hated the design of my recipes for … Continue reading →
  • Leveling up – From Goals to Pondside PlannerMay 27, 2026
    I write a lot about goals. Goals for the day, goals for life, goals for the week. Goals before retirement. Setting goals, monitoring goals, achieving goals, dropping goals. Different types of goals, different types of methods for managing goals. Having goals as a goal in and of itself. Sometimes it veers into performance measurement. Yet, … Continue reading →
  • Leveling up – Movie reviewsMay 27, 2026
    Similar to the work on the Lilypad Library (my book reviews), I’ve upgraded my movie reviews, too. First and foremost, I’ve changed the name to Lilypad Cinema. Notice the theme? Yes, I’m leaning fully into the frog motif. Second, I’ve upgraded my featured image. Previously, I used the couch potato-style image below, with the man … Continue reading →
  • Frog writing book review entries into a journal
    Leveling up – Book reviewsMay 26, 2026
    Soooo…I have said a few times over the last few years, “NEVER AGAIN WILL I EVER CHANGE MY BOOK REVIEWS FORMAT.” Why? Because I am generally anal-retentive, and with 300 completed reviews, there is a niggly part of me where, if I change something, I want to go back and change all of them to … Continue reading →
  • Book clubs 2026-05: May the rigour be with you (it wasn’t with me)May 22, 2026
    Ah, April showers have brought us May books. Wait, that’s not the right saying. I’ll get back to you on that. Remember last month when I said I was going to show rigour? Well, that didn’t happen. With the larger intake base, I have 119 entries for consideration this month. Of which, I only said … Continue reading →

Archives

Categories

© 1996-2026 - Paul Sadler aka PolyWogg Privacy Policy
↑