↓
 

The PolyBlog

My view from the lilypads

  • Home
  • Goals
    • Goals (all posts)
    • #50by50 – Status of completion
    • PolyWogg’s Bucket List, updated for 2016
  • Life
    • Family (all posts)
    • Health and Spiritualism (all posts)
    • Learning and Ideas (all posts)
    • Computers (all posts)
    • Experiences (all posts)
    • Humour (all posts)
    • Quotes (all posts)
  • Photo Galleries
    • PandA Gallery
    • PolyWogg AstroPhotography
    • Flickr Account
  • Reviews
    • Lilypad Library (Books)
      • Book Reviews (all posts)
      • Book reviews by…
        • Book Reviews List by Date of Review
        • Book Reviews List by Number
        • Book Reviews List by Title
        • Book Reviews List by Author
        • Book Reviews List by Rating
        • Book Reviews List by Year of Publication
        • Book Reviews List by Series
      • Special collections
        • The Sherlockian Universe
        • The Three Investigators
        • The World of Nancy Drew
      • PolyWogg’s Reading Challenge
        • 2026
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2015, 2016, 2017
    • Movies
      • Master Movie Reviews List (by Title)
      • Movie Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Movie Reviews (all posts)
    • Music and Podcasts
      • Master Music and Podcast Reviews (by Title)
      • Music Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Music Reviews (all posts)
      • Podcast Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Podcast Reviews (all posts)
    • Recipes
      • Master Recipe Reviews List (by Title)
      • Recipe Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Recipe Reviews (all posts)
    • Television
      • Master TV Season Reviews List (by Title)
      • TV Season Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Television Premieres (by Date of Post)
      • Television (all posts)
  • About Me
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Me
    • Privacy Policy
    • PolySites
      • ThePolyBlog.ca (Home)
      • PolyWogg.ca
      • AstroPontiac.ca
      • About ThePolyBlog.ca
    • WP colour choices
  • Andrea’s Corner

Tag Archives: 50by50

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

#50by50ish #50 – Lose weight – Part 13, hitting a wall

The PolyBlog
January 23 2019

Earlier, I had posted about getting through the holidays and my leave, and not only did I not get completely derailed on my goal, but I also even managed to knock a couple more pounds off and break my plateau. But since then? I have hit a wall. Actually twice. The first time was significant, but merely figurative; the second time was slightly less significant, but literal.

The figurative wall

Winter tends to hit me hard, with a strong desire to just hibernate until Spring, and I don’t have a lot of coping mechanisms that are that effective at beating that lull. I’ve tried lots of things, most didn’t help.

Trips to warmer Southern climates DO help, but we tend to do those every couple of years, not every year. Too many other demands on our budget. It also sometimes backfires, particularly if the timing doesn’t coincide well with the winter blasts — if I go too early, the post-vacation blasts can run pretty long; if I go too late, I’m often too run-down before I go. 

Another coping technique I have is that I like to embrace the idea of PolySpring — my so-called “light at the end of the tunnel” by which I’m near-guaranteed likely to have no more lasting snow. The end of the hibernation and a good date to aim for — if I can hold on until then, my expectations don’t get too high earlier, and I can also remain on a relatively even keel.

Lots of advice swirls out there in the ether about how to cope with the winter blues, including embracing the outdoor life. Some of that I like the sounds of, most of it I don’t, and what I have tried left me with those two as the main techniques that help. I prefer spring and fall over a too-cold winter or a too-hot summer. And with my weight being what it has been, some possible outings have not been in the cards (I’m looking at you, Mr. x-country skiing). I know, I know, a self-fulfilling prophecy and an excuse more than an explanation.

However, in addition to the two above, one thing that has frequently worked for me has been to do a “January 1st reset” of my life each year. I would drag out my to do lists and bucket lists, and personal planning guides, and wrestle with them throughout January to update or set goals for myself. Planning, brainstorming, blogging, trying out new personal storylines on myself, coming up with new ideas on how to approach the coming year. Sometimes reading the latest and greatest in new approaches to personal planning. A chance to jump into a rabbit-hole and emerge on the other side of the winter field with a concrete plan to move forward. 

But, this year, I don’t have any goals to wrestle with mentally to distract myself. I had decided to have no other goals, just the single one that is now sitting there mocking me. My overall momentum has dropped to zero. The problem is that I’m stalled. Kind of like climbing a hill with a 4×4 and getting stopped part way up. You can’t just give it more gas, you almost have no other choice but to back down a ways and then take another run at it.  I have seriously given thought to just going for ice cream and starting “over”. Count it as a broken goal and then recommit again, doubling down.

I may be stuck on the hill, just giving it gas, but what has been worse this week is that I’m starting to slide backwards. I’ve got the brakes on to slow my descent, but I’ve started staying up late again, watching TV. Buying my lunch at work, and while slightly better choices than before, still not as good as a home made lunch, with my snacks set for the week. My motivation is almost zero. And my weight has crept back up five pounds. Not horrendous, I know, but when I’m focused on getting the weight to go down, seeing it go back to my plateau weight is not encouraging. And while I had been doing really well on my foods, I’m now HUNGRY way more often.

I tried with Andrea to vary our menu last week, testing some new recipes, but we over-programmed and I wasn’t looking forward to the various ones as much as I might have been with fewer new choices. Plus I feel like I’ve been fighting a bug the last two weeks. It could just be my body adapting to new drugs, hard to tell. And some of it is just my brain sabotaging my efforts. The hill metaphor is just that, a metaphor. It doesn’t quite hold for a goal like this, and I have no intention of giving in. 

But then, I almost had a catastrophe happen.

The literal wall

Jacob had a course at Nepean SportsPlex on Sunday morning, and we were running a bit late. We were just about to head out, Andrea and Jacob were already in the car when I realized that Jacob didn’t have his sunglasses with him. It wasn’t that bright out, he wasn’t planning to take them, but when I asked him if he wanted his sunglasses or not, he paused and then agreed he did want them after all. No problem, I could get them.

They were in his bag near the front door, and I sat down sideways on the steps in our entry way while I looked through his bag. I found them, and when I went to get up, I sort of rotated back straight, leaned forward and tried to rise.

Except my weight wasn’t entirely over my feet when I did it. And my feet weren’t on the carpet; instead, the carpet was pulled back a bit and my slightly-wet boots were on slightly-wet tile.

My feet went out from under me to the left, and I fell to the right.

Not far, not kersplat. I more “fell over” than “fell”, basically from a half-standing, half-sitting position. And I didn’t go all the way down. I couldn’t, you see.

There’s a wall there. As I fell, I stuck my forearm out to stop my descent, and caught the edge of the wall about an inch or two in from my elbow. 315 pounds falling on a single wedge of wall on a single point on my forearm.

I thought I had broken it. It hurt so bad, so instantly, and the whole thing went almost dead from that point downward, I was sure it was broken. I couldn’t even move it for a good minute. It still hurt like crazy, and I managed to get my feet under me properly and lean way forward before standing and going out to the car. When I went to put the key in the ignition, I had a lot of trouble moving my arm forward to do it. I eventually had to lean my body forward too, I couldn’t raise my arm that far. As I drove, I stretched my arm out as far as I could to get it moving again, and slowly got it moving again over the next 30 minutes. 

One hour and an ice pack later and I was good to go. I figured it would bruise, but it didn’t, not really. Sure, there’s a small bruise and a little scrape, but other than that, there’s just missing paint from the edge of the wall and some residue on my coat arm. 

But it scared the crap out of me. My most immediate fear is not about my heart or weight or BP or any of that — it’s falling on my knees and doing major damage. I have gone skating a few times in the last couple of years, and basically set aside the fear. Yet after this incident, I won’t chance it. I barely fell and came close to doing major damage to my arm. It’s still sore three days later, and if I rest the arm the wrong way on the armrest in the car or at my desk, or even just on the desk, I feel it almost instantly. If I had gone down on my knee? Hell, it hurts just KNEELING on a good day. I can’t take the risk until I get the weight down.

And of course, my brain is attacking me pretty hard. Clumsy, fat stupid PoS is basically the message it is sending, which is not doing much for my mood. Add in a rough transition from six weeks off back into work, and I’m not having a good month.

A figurative wall and a literal one. Both taking me out.

On a good day, I could turn that anger into something resembling forward motion, driving me forward. I know the only way out is through, but my brain isn’t listening at the moment. It wants to give up, but that’s not an option.

I’ve decided that I need to set a non-health goal or two to distract me from time to time and let me feel a sense of momentum when the other momentum slows. I thought the Reading Challenge might be enough, but it wasn’t. So maybe I can do a bit of mini-planning without going full-rabbit hole. See if that helps.

In the meantime, I’m mostly just pissed at myself. Almost enough to hit a wall, if I hadn’t done that twice already.

The only way out is through. The only way out is through. The only way out is through. The only way out is through…Breathing in through the nose, out through the mouth. 

Posted in Pondside Planner | Tagged 50by50, goals, health, weight | Leave a reply

#50by50ish #50 – Lose weight – Part 12, the emotions

The PolyBlog
January 16 2019

I mentioned last week that I had some ideas for some posts, and was wondering when I would write about them, which week I would handle this or that idea. But I’ve been on a bit of an emotional rollercoaster in the last week, and there’s no real cause, so I thought I would talk about that instead.

Since I started doing my blogging and telling my story, I have felt all my nerve endings range from totally dead to constant sparking, at least emotionally. Last week, I was dealing with a bit of disappointment (as I went back to work) about the fact that I hadn’t accomplished more logistically in my six weeks off, or hadn’t had greater results for my health situation. Going back to work itself is also a potential source of stress as I return to a new job, new environment, and a lot of uncertainty. Even with the great news about my A1C numbers, it was an up and down week.

Then the bus crash happened in Ottawa on Friday. And everytime something like that happens, it affects me A LOT. I picture the aftermath for the families, the fickle hand of fate knocking your men over on the chessboard that is your life. Man plans and God laughs, as the saying goes. But trying to explain some of it to Jacob was VERY emotional for me. Hell, I can get emotional at a Bell commercial, so that’s nothing new, I suppose.

Yet later, on an unrelated activity,  I was doing some story imagining techniques to kickstart my creativity and I suddenly found myself following my brain into stories and ideas with high emotional content. Eulogies and traumatic events, how to handle them, process them, etc. I was trying to distract myself and instead my internal squirrels took me there anyway.

As I started writing this, I had just finished watching an online video, nobody I knew, about a blind woman who was reluctant to put a lot of energy into a wedding that would no longer be her dream experience, and yet her photographer cum organizer created some really special techniques for her other senses. Sad in some ways but mostly happy, and I started bawling like a baby. FOR NO REAL REASON. It wasn`t that universally amazing, I didn’t know her. There was no real emotional content for me in the story, yet it wiped me out. Because my emotions are so fragile these days, or maybe just raw. I’ve been doing a bit of reading, and the most likely cause in these circumstances is the actual weight loss process.

It caught me by surprise. I assumed, as most do, that successful weight loss would lead primarily to simple feelings of happiness, but I am not naive enough to think it would cure all life’s ills either. But apparently the “heightened emotional response” can go hand in hand with weight loss.

First and foremost, lots of weight issues are tied to emotions…if you deal with the weight, it often digs up other emotions. Makes sense, and nothing new there in my view. I’d even go so far as to say I was mostly ready for it, it’s how I got to where I am.

But beyond that, I hadn’t really thought about some of the other aspects. Like that simply trying to lose weight in a visible fashion, such as taking pictures and sharing them on a blog (!), can make you feel extremely vulnerable and insecure. No longer am I hiding my true self, and thus in the parlance, I might feel exposed. (Check! By choice, because I need it to keep my motivation alive, but still check!).

That same process also attracts attention, and on a subject that I normally have shunned. I’m ill-equipped to handle it in whatever form I get as interactions (such as my normal Dive! Dive! Dive! response I mentioned in an earlier post). And regardless of the form of attention, my self-esteem is on the front line.

There are some who report anger (i.e., new attention from people makes people think the others are shallow or if the new attention isn’t supportive in the way they hope), fear, anxiety, disappointed, etc. It can even make people self-aborbed. (hmm for the first, check for the additional elements!).

Unfortunately, most of the advice out there is of the form, “The only way out is through”, and while I agree with the sentiment, it doesn’t do much to help me through the mental side of managing my emotions. The blog helps of course, as does trying to avoid comparisons, working on my self-confidence in other areas, and celebrating my achievements as I go. They also recommend setting aside time for self-reflection but I think I have that one already covered. 🙂

However, I think most importantly for me, I just have to be aware that my emotions are heightened and reactions like I’m having today are not uncommon. I just have to be ready for them. And buckle myself in for the ride.

Posted in Pondside Planner | Tagged 50by50, goals, health, weight | Leave a reply

#50by50ish #50 – Lose weight – Part 11, woot woot

The PolyBlog
January 9 2019

I was trying to decide between several different topics for this week. One that is on my mind is a variation on “it takes a village” and the support that I’ve received since going public with my journey. Another is about my actual mechanical process for food, nutrition, tracking, etc. and appointments. Another wants to update on a bunch of miscellaneous things. But I jettisoned all of them because I have BREAKING NEWS.

On Monday of this week, I had my medical checkup and this was my 3-month benchmark since I had my original blood work done in September/October. I did the new blood work last Friday, and while they are checking lots of things to be safe, the big marker for the test is my A1C number.

For those not familiar with bloodwork and diabetes, the A1C measures “blood glucose levels”. Your red blood cells have hemoglobin proteins in them to transport oxygen around your body. Sugar / glucose can attach themselves to hemoglobin, and the specific type they attach to is hemoglobin A. When the two attach, it is called glycated hemoglobin (A1C). Some people have to monitor blood glucose levels every day by pricking their thumb at home, and it’s good for daily management, but the real BIG test is the A1C marker which has a lifespan of about 120 days. While your day to day stuff can fluctuate wildly, even within a single day or after a meal or workout, the A1C is basically treated as a 3-month average. So you do the bloodwork every three months to see how you’re doing. That’s an oversimplified explanation, but close enough.

Back in October, my number went to 7.1% i.e, 7.1% of my red blood cells were glycated. Below 5.5% is considered normal.  5.5 to 5.9 is “at risk” for diabetes, 6.0 to 6.4 is pre-diabetes, and 6.5 or higher is diabetes. There’s a bit of confusion out there about 6.5 or 7.0, and I don’t know if the number changed at some point or not, but some sites list diabetes as 7.0 or above, with a prediabetes as 6.5 to 7 and at risk from 5.5 to 6.5. Regardless, I’m going with the official Canadian Diabetes Association numbers, which are the under 5.5 / 5.5-5.9 / 6.0-6.4 / 6.5+ cutoffs.

My October numbers were the first ones I had done in two years, and I was now at 7.1. Previously I had only gone as high as 5.9, and while nobody ever explained the numbers, it was “hey you’re at risk” … but I had always been “at risk” anyway, with both being overweight and having a family history of diabetes. But since I hadn’t been tested in several years, and my weight increased in that time, I blew past the “at risk” cutoff (5.9) and the prediabetes cutoff (6.4) and into official diabetes territory. I commented previously that it didn’t really mean much to me, as it seemed almost incidental to my commitment to losing weight. It didn’t really change anything for me, other than triggering some extra meds.

But when I was blogging about non-scale indicators, my sister-in-law and others pointed out that the A1C number would be a good indicator. I confess I felt almost stupid … since I had dismissed the impact of the diagnosis, I hadn’t really paid much attention to the number either. But OF COURSE it would be a good non-scale indicator, duh!

Test results

So Friday was my test date. And I have my new A1C number. My previous was 7.1. My new one?

5.9, baby! Woot woot!

Oh, sure, I’m still in the “at risk” category, but I’ve basically put myself back to where I was 2.5 years ago. And since I have kept losing weight, all my various numbers are looking good.

For example, my untreated blood pressure once went as high as 160/110, which is stroke territory. At the time, I was maxing on decongestant, so maybe not a completely “fair” number, but without decongestant, I was still  in the 140/100 range. With meds, I range from 115/85 to 130/98 or so.

Monday? My average at the office, which is often a bit higher than at home, was 111/75. Woot woot!

Medications

Which puts me in a different conversation about meds. I discussed them at some length with the doctor and then I also did a full check-up with one of the pharmacists at my regular pharmacy. My favorite pharmacist is in Peterborough of course, and my second favorite one is on vacation, so Hassan had to pinch-hit.

First up? My Metformin that I take to make my body process insulin better, and helps keep my A1C numbers under control. Some of the drop from 7.1 is from my weight loss, some from the diet changes, some from the medicine. They started me on a dose of 500 mg. I couldn’t tolerate it on my stomach, lots of cramps initially, so we cut it back to 250 mg with a plan to move to something called Jardiance. I finished my Metformin trial late last week and started the Jardiance on Saturday. One of the side effects of Jardiance is fatigue and apparently it can hit shortly after taking the medicine. Based on Saturday night and Sunday night, I wouldn’t want to be driving anywhere! Sure wiped me out fast.

However, since the Metformin was working, and even doing so at the low level of 250mg, we don’t need to actually switch me to Jardiance after all. So, I turned those pills back in, got a new Metformin prescription, and we set it at the lower dosage of 250 mg. It’s working, no need to increase is the logic. Interesting considering it is half the starting dose for most people, and some people even have to take 1500 mg a day. I’m happy with 250 mg.

For my blood pressure, I take two meds. Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothorazide. The Amlodipine is apparently not as effective as another drug, Ramipril, for those with diabetes, so we’re switching me over. Plus Amlodipine causes swelling of the ankles and calves which I have experienced. I will be happy to not have that, if it helps. I have to monitor though for the risk of the new medication taking my blood pressure TOO low, since at 111/75, I’m at the very low end of the med’s usage. When I lose another 25-30 pounds, we’ll need to revisit that amount…might have to reduce the dosage. I’m only at 5mg on the new one, so we’ve already reduced slightly. We’ll revisit the Hydrochlorothorazide in 3-6 months too but I might be able to get off that one completely and just use Ramipril for the future, and maybe even get rid of that one too eventually. Woot woot!

That leaves my Lansaprazole / Prevacid. I’d like to get off that too, but considering without it that my first “incident” had me thinking I was having a heart attack, I want to ensure the efficacy of whatever approach we take to weaning me on to something else. It might just be something like Tums or Gaviscon.

Although I confess that while I’m okay with doing that, I’m of two minds…first I need to be sure of the efficacy, but second that we are basically substituting a med that I have to pay for myself for one that is already covered. I can afford it, but I know there are lots of people out there who wouldn’t be too thrilled about shelling out extra cash for something each month if it is already “addressed” through their existing meds. I understand the health implications, and the reason to switch, I just find it a bit less obvious a decision than the medical professionals seem to think. None of them have asked at all about the cost implications to me. Again, fine for me, but what about others?

On the other hand, I just filled a prescription last week for two months of Jardiance but I only took it for two days and then gave it back for destruction. I’d like to think they would reuse the meds as they are in sealed individual blister packs, but I know they probably can’t. Meanwhile the benefit plan paid for them and I’m sure it’s not cheap.

Overall, I was at three meds before this started, and I’m up to four with a chance to be down to three in three months, two in six months, one in nine months, and maybe, maybe,  maybe, none as of a year from now. Although, as my favorite pharmacist pointed out, I may still have one med to act as a protective / preventative med to make sure my body doesn’t get too worse at processing sugar. And so far at least, no injections. A friend was telling me about Trulicity working well for them, but so far, I don’t need it, everything I have is working well.

Woot woot! Even if the original diagnosis didn’t matter to me, I’ll take the 5.9 as an external indicator of progress.

Posted in Pondside Planner | Tagged 50by50, goals, health, weight | Leave a reply

#50by50ish #50 – Lose weight – Part 9, fitness standards

The PolyBlog
December 19 2018

Last week, I talked about various performance indicators of success in my weight loss. Not surprisingly, the first group is my actual weight — using a simple weight scale to chart my success, failure or continued plateauing. Since you can make progress without losing actual weight, i.e. by shifting weight around, I am also doing body measurements. Third, I have more qualitative measures around psychology, physical elements, clothing, social, exercise and functional fitness. While some of the comments I received will be helpful in fine-tuning some of the indicators, and perhaps delving into wellness indicators (not entirely sure about that area yet), it seems to me that there is something missing.

Maybe it’s a hold-over from my childhood with the Canada Fitness Test where I couldn’t meet the standard, but I went looking for an objective test of fitness. I was apparently fairly naive in my approach. I thought I would punch “adult fitness test” into Google, and somewhere in the first couple of links, I would have a plethora of choices. Apparently that’s not quite what’s out there.

Don’t get me wrong, you do get hits almost immediately, and probably about 95% of them link to the same crowd-sourced link — the US President’s Challenge. This test was designed to take into account your age, sex, aerobic fitness (walking or running a set distance, heart rate, weight), muscular strength and flexibility (half sit-ups, sit and reach, push-ups), and body composition (BMI, height, weight, waist measurement). You enter all the information and submit it, and it will give you a fitness score. Sounds perfect, right?

Except it was established under Obama (President’s Council on Physical Fitness and Sports) and when Trump took over, it went into “permanent review”. Hence, no test. You can find out all the info from lots of sites about how to DO the test and all the steps, but one of the reasons they offered the test score online was to get you to submit your data for free to help inform their policy and program work. In order to get your score, you had to give them your data — no personal identifiers though — and they would spit out your score. Which means with the test “in review”, you can’t get your score and they don’t have the standards published online anywhere. Well, crap.

Well, no problem, there’s probably some sort of new version of the Canada Fitness Test, right? No, of course not. It got killed years ago because it encouraged body shaming for those who didn’t meet the standard. And knowledge of fitness has moved on from there, so not really the standard approach now (which is more about functional fitness).

Okay, reset. Who out there has to do fitness tests for adults? Ah-hah! The military! Of course, they must have some objective tests, let’s see what I find. Oh great, the Canadian military is in the process of switching from an old standard to a new standard. Well, at least there will be information on it. And there is. Broken down by the expected number of reps, age and sex of the candidate. Excellent. Let’s see…I’m going to need sandbags. Lots of sandbags. Wait, what?

Right, of course. A military fitness test is designed to test abilities, in theory, that a member of the military might have to have in a combat or rescue/emergency situation. So they have four elements in the test:

  • Sandbag lift — 30 reps of lifting a 20kg sandbag above a height of 1.0 m, alternating between two sandbags separated by 1.25m, have to complete it within 3m30s;
  • Intermittent loaded shuttles — 10 reps of carrying a 20kg sandbag 20m and back, alternating between loaded and unloaded bags, 400m in total, have to complete within 5 minutes and 21 seconds;
  • Sandbag drag — 1 rep without stopping of carrying a 20kg sandbag while dragging four 4 a total of 20m;
  • Rushes — Two rushes of 20m (there and back = 2 x 20m x 2 = 80m) where you start from prone position, dropping to prone position every 10m, have to complete within 51s;

Okay, that is pretty specific. So I thought I had an option for my test, even if it wasn’t very “normal” looking. Then I reached out to a friend in the Canadian military who basically said the test wasn’t very accurate of fitness levels, was too tailored to the military, and well, without being too pointed, that it was considered kind of useless by those in the know. But there are a lot of physical, political, organizational and social factors that go into coming up with a test like that, with a lot of stakeholders with a view, and well, the test is what it is.

Hmm…doesn’t sound very enticing, does it? Plus, I don’t really have a place to do sandbag shuttles every day to practice. I was hoping that perhaps some company was running fitness tests on retainer, and that perhaps I could piggy-back on their public offerings to just pay for a spot once a month. Okay, maybe not.

I checked out the US Military site, just to see what they have. It looked a little more traditional, a bit more like basic training in movies:

  • Height and weight
  • Body Fat
  • Two-mile run
  • Push-up
  • Sit-up

Hey! That looks a lot like the President’s Challenge! Great! Now, click here, click there, oh look, they have the standards. Run down the list, see if I’m a male of age 50, and I do x number of situps, I get y points. Perfect. Wait, points? What do the points mean?

Oh. You get points for each of the five areas, there is no “fail” area or “gold standard” really (nor an Award of Excellence) for any of the individual exercises, but you combine all the points and you get an overall score. Which is doable, except there’s also seemingly no published standard for the overall score. Hmm…what if I started with a perfect score and worked backwards? If I draw down the official standards, then as a male in the age 47-51 age bracket, I would get:

Exercise / Points100 Points90 Points80 Points70 Points60 Points50 Points
Push-ups59 reps50 reps42 reps34 reps25 reps17 reps
Sit-ups66 reps57 reps48 reps39 reps30 reps21 reps
2 mile run14m24s15m42s16m54s18m12s19m30s20m48s

When I look at some other sites, all of which have some variations of the President’s challenge, a few say “if you’re a man, x number of pushups are good, or if you’re over 65, blah blah blah”. They don’t differentiate by age other than “over 65”. For the rare one or two that do, men my age were estimated that they should be able to do 13-15 pushups. So the 50 point threshold seems like a decent starting point. For situps, they recommended a goal of 33, somewhere around 65 points. A little different, although the one above was how many to do in a minute vs. how many to do at all. The 2-mile run numbers are a bit hard to compare as almost all of the other sites used different distances or focused on your heart-rate after doing the distance, not the time.

So the US Military stuff gets me in the ballpark, but where does that leave me? A bit narrowly focused, based on other pages. Let’s see if I can expand that a bit…

Strength

I’ve already covered sit-ups and push-ups. Various men’s fitness programs, magazines and websites vary around what a “strong” athlete looks like, but for basic fitness, the “good” target for bench pressing is 1.5x your body weight. So, let’s see, I would have to bench about 475 pounds. Oh, that’s funny. Now, if my goal is 185 pounds overall, that would be a target bench-press of 275 pounds. I have absolutely no idea if that would be easy, moderate or hard-core. I went back to some really old workouts and I wasn’t fully pushing, more interested in cardio, but I was only doing about 75 pounds. Ook.

Okay, a leg press was better for me. Recommended target is 2.25x your body weight. At the present, that would be 710 pounds. Lord. I might as well be trying to push a Buick. Final target when I reach my weight goal would be 415 pounds. Again, I have no idea if that is easy, moderate or hard-core. Relying on an old work-out sheet, I was able to do 200 without really pushing it, so I feel it might be at least doable eventually. Maybe I’m crazy though.

I’m also crazy when it comes to the old “flexed arm-hang” exercise though. It was my nemesis when I was younger, and somehow my brain thinks if I could do it properly now, it would signal to my body that I’m “in shape”. I can’t find much on what a flexed arm-hang would look like for timing, so I’ll probably have to develop that one myself. However, a few sites have info on doing pull-ups, and the recommendation is that a man of 50 years old should be able to do 10.

If I’m honest with myself, I should be doing chin-ups (palms facing) not pull-ups (palms outward) if I want to be closer to a flexed-arm hang, but chin-ups are easier than pull-ups (chin-ups use more biceps than pull-ups), so it’s a wash. And if I’m REALLY honest with myself, I’d love to be able to do five muscle-ups (a pull-up with a slight kick to get some momentum to get your waist up to the bar). Ever since I saw Stephen Amell (star of the show Arrow) do them in a training video, I thought they were so perfect-looking for someone in good shape working hard to do something. Here’s one of his videos:

And lastly, there is a REALLY weird item that I found in a bunch of places as a test of strength. From a kneeling position, you need to throw a basketball…it never says if you are throwing one-armed or double-armed, but the test is to see if you can throw it 75 feet. It’s weird, but I kind of like it. I’d even like to try it as a triple test — one-armed throw, overhead throw, and normal shot.

Speed & Endurance

So, as I noted above, most of the tests online use running a 1.5 m or walking 1 mile test and then testing heart rates. For straight time, they suggest the 1.5 miles should be done in 12:00 to 14:25. Or, if I was looking at the military times for 2 miles, basically the same time they have as the gold standard to do another half-mile too. If I stuck to that overall “gold” standard of the military, and applied it at an even pace throughout the run, it would be 1.5 miles in 10:48 (100 points) or 15:22 (50 points). So the generic 12-14:25 is about the middle.

Most of the tests recommend the “perfect” test being a full V02 test where you get hooked up to breathing masks and heart monitors like you see in TV and movies with someone running on a treadmill. Not the easiest test to do or come by, so no.

There are three that crop up as just binary “can you do them” standards. Two are pretty simple — one is running 5km and the other is treading water for 2 minutes and then swimming 20m. The third involves a 12″ step where you step up with your dominant foot, then your second so you’re standing fully on the step, step down with dominant foot and lower your second foot. Repeat continuously for three minutes. Presumably they could all be modified — run 1km, then 2km, etc.  or tread water for 1 minute before swimming or tread for 2 minutes and then swim only 10m.

And then there are two that are not so much about endurance as specific speeds: running 300 yards in under 1 minute or swimming 700 yards in under 12 minutes. Obviously, those two could be easily converted to a more graduated number (300 yards in 2 minutes or swimming 700 yards in 20 minutes, etc.) for a varied standard.

While I can do these exercises, in theory at least, it is hard to figure out exactly how graduated the various levels would be to match the original “scoring” of the military test.

Movement

I feel like I don’t have the right elements for movement and agility/flexibility. All the tests out there basically use the “sit and reach” test that was included in the President’s Challenge. Basically you put your heels on a tape measure at 15″ (so your 0″ is somewhere around your knees), and then you lean forward and touch the floor beside the measuring tape. The higher the number (i.e. reaching past your toes) is good. 16″, 17″, 18″. The recommendation for men over 50 is somewhere around 17″. As with above, I could modify that to give scoring like with the military one. Of course, the first step is just being able to TOUCH my toes while sitting, but let’s not quibble at this point.

I am not sure the fascination with basketball in these tests, probably the availability of the court, but for a vertical height test, they basically recommend trying to reach and touch a basketball rim. For junior high through to the NBA, that height is relatively fixed at 10 feet. Most of the tests suggest jumping next to a wall and slapping the wall at various heights to see how high you are jumping if you can’t reach the rim. If I’ve learned anything from movies, it’s that White Men Can’t Jump, and it sure as hell applies to me. I’m not even sure I could whiff the net on a court.

Again, if I’m honest with myself, there are two better indicators of my jumping ability that interest me. First and foremost, I don’t want to touch the rim, I would want to be able to dunk a basketball. That would be my top standard. Touching the rim is good, sure, but true performance would require me to get even higher.

Secondly, I love watching American Ninja Warrior, and I am inspired not so much by their stories of change and perseverance but by the sheer abilities they have to get from A to B. I don’t have the courage to try true parkour running, but I saw a video of one of my favorite ANW athletes, Jessie Graff, doing vertical jumps onto a surface. Most people do them on to boxes, Jessie jumps onto whatever is handy.

You can buy actual boxes and stands to do this on, and the sizes range from as low as 14″ up to 30″. Of course, lots of people then stack the boxes in gyms or pile up large mats. Or if you are Jessie, you use large tires and mats to get up to 55″ with a running start.

I probably shouldn’t use her performance as my target height though.

Lastly, there is a balance test. You are basically supposed to be barefoot, stand on one leg, and place the second leg bent in a triangle (foot to your shin or knee that you’re balancing on). For those of you who have done yoga, you know this is the beginner Tree Pose. In an ideal yoga world, you’d get the heel of your second foot all the way up to your thigh, but for now, it is just a simple balance test and the “simpler” version is on your shin or knee. And you hold it. The test standard suggests a 30 second hold, once on each leg. I don’t know if this is a great “standard” or test element in the long run, but it seems like a decent starting point. While other yoga moves will increase stability and balance, this might work as a simple overall test of balance and basic agility.

A reality-check

I am not likely to automatically meet ANY of these test standards at the level I want to meet them, even when I drop to 185 pounds. I can get the weight down, it doesn’t say anything about my functional fitness – strength, endurance and movement. However, that’s a job for my new BowFlex and yoga exercises to help with. I will come back to the “fitness” test with an actual standard and my performance in a few months (perhaps once Poly Spring hits after April 15th). For some of the tests, I’m going to need help, such as having Jacob time me for laps or running, for example. My heart results came back normal when I did my stress test, so I’m all clear for everything, but I can’t even attempt these tests until I have some basic fitness improvements. Heck, I couldn’t even DO one chin or pull-up at this point. And my knees would NEVER allow me to run.

Baby steps, but at least I have a destination.

Posted in Pondside Planner | Tagged 50by50, goals, health, weight | 2 Replies

#50by50ish #50 – Lose weight – Part 8, off-scale success

The PolyBlog
December 11 2018

One of the first things you see when looking at weight loss stories or advice/tips/tricks from professionals is that it isn’t “all about the number”. People commenting on my posts on FB have echoed that advice too — reminding me to also look for success indicators that are not tied to my weight scale. What some experts call “off-the-scale” or “off-scale” success. These “other” indicators become not only philosophically important, moving you from a technical definition of obesity tied to your weight or Body Mass Index to a more functional definition of fitness, but also psychologically crucial if you bust your ass between weigh-ins and yet the needle doesn’t move because you’ve hit a plateau.

And with my typical analytical zeal, combined with my love of all things performance measurement related at work, I adapted my approach to take into account these “other factors”. I also used my research time to look at various milestones to give me way stations along the journey, markers to tell me I’ve achieved some arbitrary measure of success, something other than the obvious 157 little milestones for each pound lost or one big milestone at the end.

So with a bit of extra zeal, here are the first three sets of indicators for my journey.

A. Weight-loss milestones

While these are still “weight-based”, they are more about specific milestones. With my overall weight goal of going from 342 pounds down to 185, i.e. a drop of 157 pounds, that number is too big to be much motivation on a short-term basis. Instead, I broke it down in 10% increments…10% of 157, 20% of 157, etc. This gives me 10 clear targets between my start and finish. I have also added in 5 other weight targets, mini-objectives that fall between those 10% increments (1 each between 20 and 30%, 30% and 40%, 40% and 50%, 60% and 70%, and finally 90% and 100%) based on another more psychological total, numbers that are symbolic to me. Which means, for those doing basic math at home, I have 15 weight-related milestones to focus on.

Progress so far:

My first milestone was Level 1, the loss of 10% of my full goal. This worked out to 15.7 pounds, and would take me to 326.3. Back in Week 17, I hit below that number for the first time — 319.8 on October 10th. LEVEL ONE ACHIEVED!

Next goal: 310.6 (20%)

My next working target is 310.6, or 20% of my overall target. I’m at week 26 this week and the last 8-9 weeks have been frustrating on this front as I have hit a plateau, which goes hand-in-hand with finding it hard to regain my original commitment and momentum to be eating the way I’m supposed to be each day.

B. Body measurements

One type of indicator that most weight loss programs use to track non-scale success is measurement of various parts of the body. The premise is simply that you may be still making progress, but muscle is denser than fat, and you might be getting “leaner” without getting “lighter”, or you might be moving/shifting weight around on your body. If the goal is to be fit, not simply “lighter”, those shifts and changes may indicate forms of progress that your simple weight scale won’t pick up. It’s also one of the reasons why so many people hate BMI as a measurement tool — people with the same overall weight and height have the same BMI, yet they could be in two totally different sets of proportions and degrees of fitness. Scales, and the BMI, can tell you one story, but not necessarily the whole story.

Awhile ago, I had helped someone with a diet program and their program used a bunch of measurements. I was shocked by two things. First and foremost, that the numbers were not as precise as I expected. Measuring my own neck, for instance, can give me widely different numbers (shifting as much as 5%) just by slightly altering the angle or how tight you pull the tape measure. It is, regrettably, incredibly imprecise. Secondly, I discovered that all those ads on TV where someone lost 14 inches in one week, etc. was incredibly misleading. I never really thought about them, I assumed they meant around the waist. In some cases, sure, but in other cases it was some misleading math — two inches off their chest, four inches off their waist, two inches off each leg, etc. until it added up to a “loss of 14 inches”. Really? REALLY? Hmm…not even sure that qualifies as legal, but it is certainly misleading.

Anyway, regardless, I went through a whole bunch of websites that talked about these types of measurements and came up with a list of 16 areas of my body to measure and track progress. I do the measuring, which isn’t that effective, and Jacob does the recording on a sheet of paper, every two weeks. He then takes three pictures of me in my non-stylish, least flattering gray shorts: first straight-on and then right and left profiles.

I’ve been looking really hard at the measurement data, and the only solution I can come up with the random fluctuations each week between my shifting it a slight half-inch or pulling a bit tighter or looser than last time is to average them out. Perhaps a three-measurement average. Over time, those “effects” should, I think, cancel each other out a bit. If the average goes down, it should indicate progress not controlled by vagaries of measurement. I guess. I honestly don’t know, I just know that the measurements are wonky, not static/stable. Equally, if I take the marketing approach and add everything up, it will iron out glitches in individual measurements even more i.e. if there is a “net change” overall, I’m making progress.

PartDescriptionOct 30
Nov 13Nov 27Dec 11CHANGE
NeckLargest part19 in19

19.5

Ave: 19.17

19

Ave: 19.17

—
BustAt nipple line52 in52.75

53

Ave: 52.88

53

Ave: 52.92

+.33
ChestJust under bust52 in52.5

51

Ave: 51.83

51

Ave: 51.50

-.33
Waist1/2 in above belly button53.75 in55

55

Ave: 54.58

55

Ave: 55

+.42
StomachBelly button54.5 in53.5

55

Ave: 54.33

54

Ave: 54.17

-.17
HipsBiggest part47.5 in47.5

48

Ave: 47.67

48

Ave: 47.83

+.17
Thigh, RightBiggest part27.5 in27.5

26.5

Ave: 27.17

26

Ave: 26.67

-.50
Knee, RightAbove knee20.5 in19.5

20.5

Ave: 20.17

20

Ave: 20

-.17
Calf, RightBiggest part19 in18.5

19.5

Ave: 19.00

19.5

Ave: 19.17

+.17
Thigh, LeftBiggest part27.5 in27

28

Ave: 27.50

28

Ave: 27.67

+.17
Knee, LeftAbove knee20 in20.5

22.5

Ave: 21

21

Ave: 21.33

+.33
Calf, LeftBiggest part20 in20

20

Ave: 20

20

Ave: 20

—
Upper Arm, RightBiggest part18.25 in16.5

17

Ave: 17.25

17

Ave: 16.83

-.42
Forearm, RightBiggest part13.5 in11.5

12.5

Ave: 12.50

12.5

ave: 12.17

-.33
Upper Arm, LeftBiggest part18.5 in16.5

17.5

Ave: 17.50

16.50

Ave: 16.83

-.67
Forearm, LeftBiggest part13 in11.5

13

Ave: 12.50

13

Ave: 12.5

—

Progress so far: 1 inch

If the mathematical approach is to add up all the “inches”, I guess I’ve lost an inch overall. However, given that I don’t really know what my “goals” are for each of these areas, my real progress is that I have done the measurements four times (the Seinfeld Method for consistency of measurements, yay me!). Since I do the measurements two weeks apart, the rolling average of 3 basically means “over the course of the last four weeks” i.e. a monthly measurement, updated biweekly, which sounds about right.

But here is the completely wonky part. I know the math doesn’t make any sense to add up all the measurements, not really, just in a generic sense that if the overall totals go down, you are “smaller”. Or if one specific area is something you are targeting, sure. And while I know all that, the fact that all of it adds up to an overall loss of 1 inch, 1 measly inch, is encouraging. As I said, I plateaued a few weeks ago, so I’ll take any progress I can find. Even ones of dubious lineage.

Next goal: ?

While I’m hoping the numbers change overall, I don’t really have specific numerical goals for each part, except perhaps my pants size. I have a 30 inch inseam, and I’d like to get to the point where I could wear 30″/30″ pants. I vaguely remember being in pants at the 28/30/32″ range and I know someone I consider reasonably fit who is also 30″. I feel like 34″ would be too big, but I really don’t know. I guess I’ll fine tune this as I get close. However, in the meantime, I’ll track it. Maybe it will show movement when I’m stuck on a plateau, like now.  A friend really likes the idea of dropping a “dress size”, but since that doesn’t really work for men, the pants size is about the best I can do for now.

C. Qualitative Indicators

I mentioned above that I researched the heck out of various websites and other resources to find “other” indicators that I could use to mark progress, and as I did so, many of them were completely irrelevant to me. Some of them were lifestyle issues that I don’t have, or choices that are not part of my mindset, or involved specific types of partnerships that I don’t have or don’t want. Which left me picking and choosing from a laundry list of possible indicators to come down to some that are applicable to me. My final list is a mish-mash of some 40 items and it looks chaotic even to me. Some of them I’ve already achieved, so it’s not as bad as having 40 still out there, but I feel like they need a bit of a framework to help me understand them, let alone explain them to others. This is what I have come up with.

CategoryDescriptionTier 1Tier 2Tier 3
Initial commitment (Psychological)Start the journey and early progress
  • Commit to the journey
  • Announce goal
  • Get professional help
  • Seinfeld progress for plan
Weight measurement (Physical)Ongoing tracking
  • First weigh-in
  • First pound
  • First healthy week
  • First set of measurements
  • Overcome a plateau
  • Change of 1″ in waist
  • Change of 5″ in waist
  • Change of 10″ in waist
  • See my toes past my belly
  • See “abs” or other muscle definition
ClothingHow clothing fits
  • Wardrobe feels looser
  • Need to tighten my belt
  • Notice a difference in photos
  • Fit into “old clothes” (275 lbs)
  • Need transition clothes (240 or 205 lbs)
  • Need new wardrobe (185)
  • Fit into ~30″ pants
SocialInteractions with friends and family
  • Discuss it with Andrea and Jacob
  • Discuss it with professionals
  • Discuss it with others (other family, friends)
  • Receive compliment
  • A’s ability to hug me
  • J’s ability to hug me
ExerciseFormal exercise routine
  • First set of 5 push ups
  • First set of 5 crunches
  • First work-out on Bowflex
  • First pull-up at park
  • First yoga/cardio workout
  • First time on bicycle
  • Develop fitness test
  • First week of 3 workouts on Bowflex
  • First week of 2 yoga/cardio workouts
  • First week of 2 bicycle outings
  • Attempt fitness test
  • First week of 5 workouts
  • First week of 6 workouts
  • First week of 7 workouts
  • Passing element of fitness test
  • Passing element in each section of fitness test
  • Passing entire fitness test
Functional FitnessInformal signs of fitness
  • Take stairs from parking to 1st floor at work
  • Take stairs to 1st floor easily
  • Do something that felt awkward before
  • Tying shoes without effort
  • Kneeling without pain
  • Take stairs from parking to 2nd floor
  • Take stairs to 2nd floor easily
  • Stairs from parking to building floor
  • Stairs from 2nd to 7th
  • Stairs from 2nd to 10th

Progress so far: Multiple items

I don’t know if those six categories are the right categories exactly, but they’re good enough to get going. And, as you can see from the list, I have made some progress already:

– Commit to the journey
– Announce goal
– Get professional help
– First weigh-in
– First pound
– First set of measurements
– Discussed it with Andrea and Jacob
– Discussed it with professionals
– Discussed it with friends and family last week (family gathering)
– Have received an unsolicited compliment that someone noticed a change
– Andrea finds it “easier” to hug me now, not quite as big around as I was

Next goal: Complete Tier 1

The big hold-outs for me in Tier 1 is mainly around getting going on the fitness. I had hoped to meet with the kinesiologist soon to get some help with that, but with some scheduling issues, that won’t happen until January. In the meantime, I will get started on my own. Which requires a crapload of work in the basement to get it all arranged properly. But that’s why I took the time off, right? 🙂

And that’s a wrap for almost all of the measurements/indicators. If you know of others, I’m happy to consider them!

Next week, I’ll blog about taking ALL of the measurements, turning them on their head, and going hard-core on 18 unique ones.

Posted in Pondside Planner | Tagged 50by50, goals, health, weight | Leave a reply

Post navigation

← Previous Post
Next Post→

Countdown to Retirement

Days

Hours

Minutes

Seconds

Retirement!

One of my favourite sites

And it's new sister site

My Latest Posts

  • A red-eyed tree frog wearing a panda apron is stirring food in the Lilypad Kitchen.
    Leveling up – Three kitchens, one frogMay 28, 2026
    Let me start with a confession. I only have 12 recipes on the website. Not much of a start, right? But this is part of my anal-retentive side. I like to curate recipes, find some good ones, and then put them on my blog. Except that I have hated the design of my recipes for … Continue reading →
  • Leveling up – From Goals to Pondside PlannerMay 27, 2026
    I write a lot about goals. Goals for the day, goals for life, goals for the week. Goals before retirement. Setting goals, monitoring goals, achieving goals, dropping goals. Different types of goals, different types of methods for managing goals. Having goals as a goal in and of itself. Sometimes it veers into performance measurement. Yet, … Continue reading →
  • Leveling up – Movie reviewsMay 27, 2026
    Similar to the work on the Lilypad Library (my book reviews), I’ve upgraded my movie reviews, too. First and foremost, I’ve changed the name to Lilypad Cinema. Notice the theme? Yes, I’m leaning fully into the frog motif. Second, I’ve upgraded my featured image. Previously, I used the couch potato-style image below, with the man … Continue reading →
  • Frog writing book review entries into a journal
    Leveling up – Book reviewsMay 26, 2026
    Soooo…I have said a few times over the last few years, “NEVER AGAIN WILL I EVER CHANGE MY BOOK REVIEWS FORMAT.” Why? Because I am generally anal-retentive, and with 300 completed reviews, there is a niggly part of me where, if I change something, I want to go back and change all of them to … Continue reading →
  • Book clubs 2026-05: May the rigour be with you (it wasn’t with me)May 22, 2026
    Ah, April showers have brought us May books. Wait, that’s not the right saying. I’ll get back to you on that. Remember last month when I said I was going to show rigour? Well, that didn’t happen. With the larger intake base, I have 119 entries for consideration this month. Of which, I only said … Continue reading →

Archives

Categories

© 1996-2026 - Paul Sadler aka PolyWogg Privacy Policy
↑