↓
 

The PolyBlog

My view from the lilypads

  • Home
  • Goals
    • Goals (all posts)
    • #50by50 – Status of completion
    • PolyWogg’s Bucket List, updated for 2016
  • Life
    • Family (all posts)
    • Health and Spiritualism (all posts)
    • Learning and Ideas (all posts)
    • Computers (all posts)
    • Experiences (all posts)
    • Humour (all posts)
    • Quotes (all posts)
  • Photo Galleries
    • PandA Gallery
    • PolyWogg AstroPhotography
    • Flickr Account
  • Reviews
    • Books
      • Book Reviews (all posts)
      • Book reviews by…
        • Book Reviews List by Date of Review
        • Book Reviews List by Number
        • Book Reviews List by Title
        • Book Reviews List by Author
        • Book Reviews List by Rating
        • Book Reviews List by Year of Publication
        • Book Reviews List by Series
      • Special collections
        • The Sherlockian Universe
        • The Three Investigators
        • The World of Nancy Drew
      • PolyWogg’s Reading Challenge
        • 2026
        • 2023
        • 2022
        • 2021
        • 2020
        • 2019
        • 2015, 2016, 2017
    • Movies
      • Master Movie Reviews List (by Title)
      • Movie Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Movie Reviews (all posts)
    • Music and Podcasts
      • Master Music and Podcast Reviews (by Title)
      • Music Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Music Reviews (all posts)
      • Podcast Reviews (by Date of Review)
      • Podcast Reviews (all posts)
    • Recipes
      • Master Recipe Reviews List (by Title)
      • Recipe Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Recipe Reviews (all posts)
    • Television
      • Master TV Season Reviews List (by Title)
      • TV Season Reviews List (by Date of Review)
      • Television Premieres (by Date of Post)
      • Television (all posts)
  • About Me
    • Subscribe
    • Contact Me
    • Privacy Policy
    • PolySites
      • ThePolyBlog.ca (Home)
      • PolyWogg.ca
      • AstroPontiac.ca
      • About ThePolyBlog.ca
    • WP colour choices
  • Andrea’s Corner

Tag Archives: publishing

New featured images – Writing

The PolyBlog
April 19 2020

I mentioned in an earlier post (New featured images – Headers, website posts, and computers) that I was upgrading my setup on my website for graphics, and I’ve already covered posts related to astronomy, my website and computers, and governance (governance, international development, civil service, a conference and my HR Guide). For my website posts, I used to frequently use an image of a frog typing:

I decided during this update that I wanted to re-purpose that image to just be about writing, so I found other images for my website/blogging options.

But even with that re-purposing, and saving it for writing, I’m left with a second question. Do I use it for MY writing, i.e., my fiction? Or do it use it when I’m writing about the craft of writing? Or both?

I confess up until recently, a lot of categories related to my writing have tended to blend together. For example, while I have 52 posts that are in the “writing” category, only five of them are ONLY in the writing category; the other 47 are cross-posted with publishing, family, even weight-loss. Which is a bit of a question mark for me…if I decide to write about a topic on my blog, isn’t it ALL writing?

When it comes to family, I have written eulogies for my father and mother, and a wedding speech for my own wedding. Back in university, I did a skit nite for stand-up style comedy, and my weekend update sketch is on my site. Those are quite different from most of my posts, and I would say are samples of my “writing”. They cross-post, sure, but they are not posts — they are stand-alone writing projects. I’m also working on a novel that I started back in November … it clearly is NOT a “post”. So I have filed it with my writing category. And for me, I think that is the main defining criteria. When I’m writing something as a project, even though I’m posting it, it is “writing”. Anything else is, well, not “writing”.

Yet in that category, I also have a bunch of posts about the technical side of writing. Mostly articles I’ve read, or reviews of classes / books about writing. And when I think of those, it is almost like post-writing, near “editing”, or pre-writing, generic techniques. None of those phrases lend themselves to an obvious image. Editing perhaps could have a red pen marking up text, but that’s hard to show in a small graphic. I found an image of an editor sitting on a throne, or a pile of manuscripts, but those are a particular type of tone. I found one of a pencil over a marked up page, but the look wasn’t appealing, and the dimensions were wrong. I considered one of a typewriter (old school), one of a kid writing at a desk (wrong tone, wrong dimensions), and one of a pencil on blue sheet of paper (nice colours, nothing communicative).

After eliminating those, I’m down to three options. The first is a piece of text with a magnifying glass and a pencil hovering above it. It has an “editing” / “technique” vibe to it, I guess, but the image itself doesn’t resonate with me. The second is an orange piece of paper (visually appealing), with a burgundy ballpoint pen to the side. I like it, it’s decent. And the third one is a red square that looks almost like a button. With a red pencil above it writing on a piece of paper within the square. It isn’t as communicative as the orange paper with a pen, but it “pops” as a featured image. Plus I feel like the red signifies “editing” somehow. Either will work, but I’m going with the red one.

There is one other category with a similar bent to it, and for lack of a better term for the category, I labelled it “publishing”. If the writing technique comes first, and my writing comes second, then the business of getting those words into the world comes next. I could try to do something more with sales and bookstores, but that presupposes a stage that is separate from publishing. If I went the ebook world, those are likely more tightly tied together, particularly if my main sales venue were to be Amazon. As with governance, I created my own symbol. A four-quadrant circle and stuck different “avenues” or “models” of publishing in the quadrants.

With the decision to wrap these all together in the “writing” category, I’ve even decided to delete the publishing category all together. In the end, it comes down to “writing technique”, “my writing”, and the “business of writing”.

Another category complete!

Posted in Computers | Tagged computers, images, my writing, publishing, website, writing | Leave a reply

Open Access – Global Open Access Portal and Canada

The PolyBlog
May 27 2018

Continuing down the Open Access rabbithole, I found the UNESCO-led site, the Global Open Access Portal. You can even narrow it down to just Canadian access sites. Which I did. And then went further down the rabbit hole with some of the following highlights:

  • University of PEI;
  • Lakehead;
  • Library and Archives Canada;
  • Laurentian;
  • McMaster;
  • Memorial;
  • Mount Royal;
  • Mount Saint Vincent;
  • University of Manitoba;
  • Mutopia;
  • National Research Council;
  • University of Regina;
  • Queen’s;
  • University of Ottawa;
  • Waterloo;
  • Ryerson;
  • Laurier;
  • Windsor;
  • Western;
  • SFU;
  • Sheridan;
  • UBC;
  • Calgary;
  • Northern BC;
  • Toronto;
  • Victoria;
  • York;
  • Athabasca;
  • Brock;
  • Carleton;
  • Concordia;
  • Dalhousie;
  • Guelph;

Not just a rabbit hole, a full-size warren!

Posted in Learning and Ideas | Tagged Canada, open access, publishing | Leave a reply

Open Access – The University of Calgary, School of Public Policy

The PolyBlog
May 27 2018

I don’t know a lot about the ins and outs of academic publishing, so let’s start by making that clear. More often than not, I’m likely to trip over government or thinktank reports than scholarly articles. I don’t have a home account for EBSCO access, or a university library account to access their scholarly journals that way, so in the absence of that type of access, I love the idea of Open Access. And when the University College of London announces they’ve hit their 1M download mark of e-texts through Open Access, that sounds outright awesome. The true power of the original university net, sharing and collaborating without restricted rights for the information. Releasing their findings into the wild.

But I do know that the world is not that clean. Academics compete for prestige journals, publishers hoard space and leverage control and $$ through access to those same journals, and while open access threatens to “disrupt” that industry, it is mostly a drop in the bucket. Publishers don’t relinquish control quite that easily. Hence you end up with people having to curate various online journals to separate the wheat from the chaff, set up lists of predatory journals to help identify “real” journals from “vanity” journals that will publish anything if the fee is paid, all with a veneer of review.

After reading the article about UCL’s milestone, I started clicking on other open access links. I started with the UCL Press site itself, quickly jumped to the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), a bunch of others competing to be the internet ring of editors that rules them all, i.e. finding them, bringing them all together, and in the darkness e-binding them. Very precious, indeed. I wanted to test the DOAJ, so I searched for scholarly journals (not just single articles) about “public administration” to see what they would find.

One of the first that popped up in the search that looked promising was the School of Public Policy publications by the University of Calgary. I went back two years and looked at 2016, 2017 and 2018 for Research Papers, Briefing Papers, Technical Papers, and Communiques. Some of it looks REALLY interesting and I will likely download a bunch of it for lunchtime reading at work. I know, I’m an admin geek. Here are some highlights of interest to me:

  1. Research Papers
    • The Theory and Evidence Concerning Public-Private Partnerships in Canada and Elsewhere (Anthony Boardman, Matti Siemiatycki, Aidan R. Vining)
    • A Major Setback for Retirement Savings: Changing how Financial Advisers are Compensated could Hurt Less-than-Wealthy Investors Most (Pierre Lortie)
    • Tax-Assisted Approaches for Helping Canadians Meet Out-of-Pocket Health-Care Costs (J.C. Herbert Emery)
    • The Disability Tax Credit: Why it Fails and How to Fix It (Wayne Simpson, Harvey Stevens)
    • Public-Interest Benefit Evaluation of Partial- Upgrading Technology (G. Kent Fellows, Robert L. Mansell, Ronald Schlenker, Jennifer Winter)
    • Discerning ‘Functional and Absolute Zero’: Defining and Measuring an End to Homelessness in Canada (Alina Turner, Tom Albanese, Kyle Pakeman)
    • Business Subsidies in Canada Comprehensive Estimates for the Government of Canada and the Four Largest Provinces (John Lester)
  2. Briefing Papers, Technical Papers and Communiques
    • On the Role & Future of Calgary’s Community Associations (Brian W. Conger, Pernille Goodbrand, Jyoti Gondek)
    • Why Banning Embedded Sales Commissions Is a Public Policy Issue (Henri-Paul Rousseau)
    • Social Policy Trends- Labour Force Participation Rate of Women with Young Children (Margarita (Gres) Wilkins, Ronald D. Kneebone)
    • Surviving and Thriving in the Digital Economy (Goran Samuel Pesic)
Posted in Learning and Ideas | Tagged open access, publishing | Leave a reply

Articles I Like: The five ways we read online

The PolyBlog
May 6 2018

ThePassiveVoice shared an article about a paper from the Web Conference related to metrics for how people read online posts, news articles, etc.

Interesting developments on how they are developing metrics based not on the clickbait sites that spread an article over several click-through pages so they can load more ads, but just how you go through a single article on the page.

Grinberg was able to identify five types of reading behaviors: “Scan,” “Read,” “Read (long),” “Idle,” and “Shallow” (plus bounce backs, in the case that someone gets to a page and almost immediately leaves). Not surprisingly, different kinds of news sites see different kinds of reading behavior. On the sports site, for instance, “we see there is a lot of scanning. I think what’s going on there is a lot of people go to sports sites in order to find a result, like the outcome of a game, and don’t read the full thing. Another example that stood out is the how-to site, where we see that there’s more idling — people read an article, idle for a little bit, then continue. From looking at the articles themselves, it looks as if people are following instructions on how to do something in the real world.” On the magazine site, meanwhile, people really seemed to be reading for extended periods of time.

[…]

SIG can be useful for publishers, Grinberg says, because it ends up being highly predictive of how engaged someone will be with an article, and they should consider it along the other metrics tracked by companies like Chartbeat.

“There’s no one-size-fits-all solution,” he said. “The magazine site provided a lot of information up front, and people still engaged in long reading. In contrast, for sports and financial sites, it seems like withholding information at the beginning is associated with longer reads. But publishers could start looking at SIG as they make decisions about strategy and experiment with different story structures to see what works for their audience.”

The five ways we read online (and what publishers can do to encourage the “good” ones) » Nieman Journalism Lab

Some of the advanced stuff looks highly subjective to me as legitimate calculations (basically trying to estimate how quickly an article gets to a specific point and where it is in the article), and would vary drastically by writer and subject matter, not to mention whether it is truly “news” or mostly filler. But interesting nevertheless…

Posted in Computers | Tagged metrics, news, online, publishing | Leave a reply

2015 – New areas of writing

The PolyBlog
January 4 2015

The seventh item on my vaguebooking list was “07. Seven new topics”. These are new “subject areas” that I want to write about on my blog.

Pop culture is likely one of them, although it might be more narrow than that, maybe “pop culture intersecting with the news”. I didn’t comment on Jian Ghomeshi or Bill Cosby’s news items when they hit, but I loved watching people post and take sides, often looking like internet trolls in comment forums except they were posting the same comments on their own social media feeds. My take is a bit different and is primarily about the law, and the court of public opinion vs. the court of justice or law. I may yet blog about it.

Equally, I love the law. So much so that I couldn’t become a lawyer. I’d like to take a subject area and blog about that, but I haven’t yet found my niche. It may very well harken back to my days at law school when I was working for the Ministry of Education in B.C. and focus on the law, schools, education, and children. I haven’t quite decided yet. But there’s an itch there that I’d like to scratch again.

In the realm of writing, I have three areas that are of interest to me. First and foremost is the changing nature of the business model of publishing. I’m very much in the world where “everyone must choose their own path”, and I may turn my attention again to the world of disrupted publishing. Second, I think there is a lot of general information out there about marketing of books in the modern age, but not a lot that gives a comprehensive list of “here’s everything you COULD do, choose wisely”. I started work on this at one time and would like to go back to it. Finally, I also think there is a ripe area for a different slant on books and publishing, and that’s measuring the performance of libraries. I did some research and even some preliminary writing about three years ago but never brought anything to fruition. I think libraries are going to come under increased fire in the digital age, and while they have a strong role to play, I don’t think many of them are telling the right story or using the right yardsticks. When they tell their story initially, they act as a community centre; when their funding is threatened, they claim critics are burning books and destroying literacy if the library goes the way of the dodo. The balance is off, and maybe I can find something I can contribute to the conversation.

In a similar vein, I’m wondering if I have something to say about charities. I feel that much of the rhetoric out there is a bit one-sided, or at times, diametrically-opposed two-sided. I know, for example, that there is not much out there giving people insights into different types of charities. I also have some questions for myself that I want answered on local basic human needs programming and the most effective means of contributing donor dollars.

Finally, I do reviews for books, movies, TV and music, or at least my website says I do. I’ve been a slacker-doodle for my reviews, and I want to get back into them. I am not yet ready to commit to exactly what the other six categories will look like when I’m done, but I know this one pretty well. So, I commit to:

  • 24 book reviews;
  • 250 reviews of TV episodes (tweets);
  • 24 movie reviews; and,
  • 3 new reviews of Billboard year-end results.

That should keep me busy too.

Posted in Goals | Tagged 2015, books, charities, culture, education, goals, law, libraries, movies, music, pop, pricing, publishing, reviews, self-promotion, tv, website | Leave a reply

Countdown to Retirement

Days

Hours

Minutes

Seconds

Retirement!

One of my favourite sites

And it's new sister site

My Latest Posts

  • AI testing: The Bad…Time loops, tech support quirks, and driftApril 18, 2026
    By now, most people have seen some form of AI crop up in their tools. The most obvious one is Google’s search engine, which provides results from its AI mode first in the list. You can go pretty far with that prompt, even asking for image creation, although that’s a terrible place to create images … Continue reading →
  • More workplanning on my new Calibre libraryMarch 28, 2026
    I wrote earlier this week (Using Calibre to embrace my inner librarian for ebooks) about the Poly Library 3.0, and when I did, I thought I had most of my “work” done. I had decided on three main areas (the book profile, user engagement, and user tools), although, truth be told, I had four categories … Continue reading →
  • An update on Jacob…March 24, 2026
    For those of you who don’t know, as I didn’t blog about this much before, Jacob decided to have surgery on his legs this year, which he did at the end of February. I’ve held off posting anything as I didn’t want to ask Jacob what he was comfortable with me sharing, but today was … Continue reading →
  • Using Calibre to embrace my inner librarian for ebooksMarch 23, 2026
    I have used Calibre literally for years to manage all my ebooks. It started way back when Kindle was doing a huge business of people pushing freebies of their ebooks. Some good, some slush, all free. But it meant a LOT of ebooks to manage. So I tried a couple of programs, most of which … Continue reading →
  • What would you put in a personal health dashboard / framework?March 8, 2026
    I started this year with a few short plans to work on health factors in my life. Some of it was prescribed; I needed a physical exam for certain pension forms. Others were ones that I was trying to do some proactive work on, like my teeth and my feet. And still others were more … Continue reading →

Archives

Categories

© 1996-2025 - PolyWogg Privacy Policy
↑