This book marks the third in the Crimebusters series, with the Three Investigators in a plane crash with Bob’s father.
What I Liked
After the plane crash, they are forced to “rough it”, with standard adventure fare. The mystery is classic Three Investigators, and the series is beginning to somewhat settle into the new characters.
What I Didn’t Like
The adventure side degrades into dealing with polluters with M-16 rifles and there is a “fight” scene that again is very far removed from the Three Investigators’ world.
It was ADVERTISED as a combination of a cookbook with stories about Dr. Kay Scarpetta, and in that light, it fails on all counts. There IS no story, and nothing happening in the non-story — and worse still, none of the characters act like they do in the novels. The recipes are interesting, but far from revolutionary. This book seems to have been issued for one reason and one reason only — to milk some money out of the fans and to give them almost nothing in return.
The Three Investigators series that I loved as a kid was transformed some years ago into this new Crimebusters series that I could never find in stores. The stories are aimed at young adults, but I was expecting the stories to have relatively the same type of stories that I fell in love with as a kid. Wrong. Instead, they have updated their ages from 14 to 17, updated their lifestyles from chores and bicycles to part-time jobs and cars. And thrown in lots of women to entice their hormonally-charged bodies. In short, the characters have grown up but not necessarily in keeping with the personalities they had originally. In this story, the 3Is are helping their cousin who has been charged with grand theft auto.
What I Liked
Jupe, Bob and Pete juggle the case, their jobs, and their social life to stay on top of things. In the old series, most of the time the characters were all together, or were working on different parts at the same time. In the new update, lots of other things interfere in their lives (a little more realistic, but less enjoyable). Yet Jupiter Jones is still the leader who relies on his brains more than his brawn.
What I Didn’t Like
The biggest fault is that the authors have added an action element to the series. Kind of like some of the false notes that appear in other series, the characters in this series have increased their physical fitness with karate and judo. So, eventually, there is a fight scene complete with big thugs and guns.
The Bottom Line
Same series, similar concept, same names, but different characters.
Having met the author when I was a student at the University of Victoria when he was the Director of Graduate Admissions, I had a lot of confidence in his ability to present a no-nonsense approach to the idea of Distance Education. And for the most part, he delivered. [Note: This review is of the 1999 edition, vastly out of date now 20 years later).
What I Liked
The book does a pretty good job of giving an overview of those universities where it is possible to do the majority of the degree through distance education (correspondence, audio tapes, video tapes, fax, e-mail, internet lists, etc). And there are some sections for the uninitiated to figure out if distance education is right for them. Some notable highlights, in my opinion, include:
Athabasca University: its primary method is distance ed;
California State University (Dominguez Hills): it has an interesting MA in Humanities (Art, History, Lit, Music, & Philosophy are the core courses);
City University: some campus centres around the world;
Heriod-Watt University (Edinburgh Business School): one of the UK systems with solid academic credentials but only for the truly independent learner;
Ohio University: offers two methods: independent study (with interaction and support) or truly independent study (with little support, no interaction but at half the cost);
Open University (Open Learning Agency): a strong presence in British Columbia;
Queen’s University: Only three BAs available by this method, but a strong MBA program offered through regional centres throughout Canada;
Regents College (University of the State of New York): perhaps one of the better “”credit for life”” univs.;
University of London: Similar to HWU in Edinburgh, this offers a great deal (financially and academically) but is for the serious learner only who can work alone;
University of North Dakota: Offering an MSc in Space Studies, which alone is enough to be worth noting;
University of South Africa: Has a huge selection of courses available, perhaps more than any other univ in the book, and has reasonably solid international credentials;
University of Waterloo: as always, a solid choice regardless of the medium; and,
Vermont College of Norwich University: has an interesting mentoring program tailored to adult learners, but the residency requirement might be difficult;
What I Didn’t Like
The majority of the book are all-too-brief overviews of each university. He covers them all — but the most useful tool is missing from the book. There are appendices that list, for example, the universities offering each degree. However, what is missing is a simple table that would help the reader narrow down the search. The table would list:
degree available, perhaps broken by section?;
estimated cost of the degree? (the overviews list the cost of a unit/credit, but then fails to tell you how many units/credits it takes for a degree);
if there is a notation on the transcript that the degree was obtained through distance education?;
if there is a residency requirement? (many people would eliminate a huge number of places solely on that basis alone); and,
if they give credit for life experiences? (this would aid those who would select/deselect on that basis from both sides of the argument)
The overviews give you a lot of info, but a nice index would improve the process.
Disclosure
I used to know the author as Director of Graduate Admissions at the university where I was a student.